Skip to content

Decoding NIST PQC Standards: What They Are, What’s Final, and What’s Next

Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is how we secure today’s data against tomorrow’s threat posed by future quantum computers. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) leads this effort by defining NIST PQC Standards. It has published algorithms and guidance that vendors and agencies can implement with confidence. 

On August 13–14, 2024, NIST released the first three finalized PQC standards, marking a major milestone in the global migration to quantum-resistant cryptography.

The First Three Final NIST PQC Standards (2024)

NIST published three Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) that you can deploy today: 

  1. FIPS 203: ML-KEM (based on CRYSTALS-Kyber)

    It is a key-encapsulation mechanism (KEM) used for establishing shared secrets (e.g., in TLS handshakes, VPNs). It provides three parameter sets (ML-KEM-512, -768, and -1024) to balance performance and security.

  2. FIPS 204: ML-DSA (based on CRYSTALS-Dilithium)

    It is a lattice-based digital signature scheme suitable for general-purpose code signing, document signing, and protocol authentication. It provides three parameter sets (ML-DSA-44, -65, and -87).

  3. FIPS 205 – SLH-DSA (based on SPHINCS+)

    A stateless hash-based signature scheme that offers conservative, hash-based security with larger signatures. It’s useful where long-term robustness is paramount. SLH-DSA supports 12 parameter sets, offering flexible choices across three security categories:

    • Category 1 – Equivalent to breaking AES-128 or SHA-256 with brute force. Provides strong protection for general-purpose applications.
    • Category 3 – Equivalent to breaking AES-192. Intended for environments that require stronger resistance against both classical and quantum adversaries.
    • Category 5 – Equivalent to breaking AES-256. Offers the highest level of long-term security, suitable for critical infrastructure, defense, and data that must remain confidential for decades

All three FIPS became effective on August 14, 2024, per the Federal Register notice. That means they are approved for U.S. federal use and serve as a clear signal to industry to begin adoption.  

Newer NIST Standards: FN-DSA (FALCON) and HQC

  • FALCON (to be standardized as FN-DSA / FIPS 206 – draft)

    NIST indicated that a fourth digital signature standard, based on FALCON, would be released in draft as FIPS 206. FALCON is a compact, fast lattice-based signature, useful where small signatures and high throughput matter. As of 2025, it’s progressing through the standardization pipeline.

  • HQC selected for standardization (KEM)

    In March 2025, NIST selected HQC as an additional KEM to standardize from its “fourth round” candidates. Draft standardization work follows the selection. Organizations planning for crypto-agility should track HQC’s progress so they can evaluate it alongside ML-KEM.

How to Think About the Algorithms

  1. KEMs for key establishment
    • ML-KEM (FIPS 203): Primary, high-performance default for most applications today.
    • HQC (selected 2025): Additional code-based KEM coming down the standards track. Organizations should watch drafts to compare performance and implementation trade-offs.
  2. Digital signatures
    • ML-DSA (FIPS 204): It is the most versatile choice. It balances security and efficiency, making it a strong default for tasks such as code signing, document signing, and authentication protocols.
    • SLH-DSA (FIPS 205): It takes a more conservative approach. It is hash-based, which results in larger signatures, but the security assumptions are simple and well understood, making it especially attractive for long-term robustness.
    • FN-DSA / FALCON (draft FIPS 206): It is still in the draft stage. It offers compact signatures and very high performance, which makes it appealing in scenarios where bandwidth is limited or speed is critical. Organizations should keep an eye on its progress toward final approval.

Why NIST PQC Standards Matter Right Now

  • They’re finalized and effective: The first three FIPS are not experimental, they’re approved and ready for federal and commercial adoption.  
  • Quantum timelines are uncertain, but data has a long shelf life: Even though large, code-breaking quantum computers are not here yet, adversaries can harvest now, decrypt-later. Moving to NIST-approved PQC reduces that risk.  
  • They enable crypto-agility: Designing systems to swap algorithms (e.g., ML-KEM today, HQC later if needed) ensures you’re not locked in. 
  • Cryptographic transition takes time: The shift to new cryptographic standards is a slow and complex process. It requires updating hardware, software, and protocols across entire systems. It’s a multi-year effort that involves extensive planning, testing and deployment. 

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

Key FAQs on NIST PQC Standards

Are the NIST approved PQC algorithms drop-in replacements? 
Often yes for KEMs and signatures but expect larger keys/signatures and different performance profiles. Benchmark in your environment. 

Do I need both ML-DSA and SLH-DSA? 
Not necessarily. Most will use ML-DSA for general-purpose applications. SLH-DSA is reserved for situations that demand the absolute highest level of long-term security.

  • ML-DSA is fast and efficient, making it ideal for the majority of use cases like code signing, firmware updates, and secure communication protocols. 
  • SLH-DSA’s security relies on well-understood hash functions, providing very strong long-term assurance. You’d use this for data that needs to be verifiably secure for decades, such as government archives, legal documents, and critical infrastructure data. 

What about Classic McEliece or BIKE? 
NIST evaluated multiple fourth-round KEMs and selected HQC for standardization in 2025. Others may continue in different forums, but NIST’s path forward is ML-KEM plus HQC.  

When will FALCON be finalized? 
NIST flagged FIPS 206 (FN-DSA/FALCON) for draft release and subsequent finalization steps. Track NIST announcements to time adoption plans. 

How Can Encryption Consulting Help?

If you’re still unsure where to begin your post-quantum journey, Encryption Consulting is here to guide you. As your trusted partner, we’ll support you at every stage, offering clarity, confidence, and proven expertise. 

PQC Assessment

We start by mapping your current cryptographic landscape. This involves discovering and inventorying all cryptographic assets like certificates, keys, and related dependencies. We then evaluate which systems are vulnerable to quantum threats and review the readiness of your PKI, HSMs, and applications. This leads to a detailed cryptographic inventory, quantum risk impact analysis, and a clear, prioritized action plan.  

PQC Strategy & Roadmap

Next, we design a tailored migration strategy aligned with your business goals. This includes updating cryptographic policies in line with NIST and NSA guidelines, creating governance frameworks, and embedding crypto agility principles so your systems remain adaptable. This leads to a comprehensive PQC strategy, a crypto-agility framework, and a phased migration roadmap built around your priorities and timelines.  

Vendor Evaluation & Proof of Concept

Selecting the right solutions is critical. We help you define RFP/RFI requirements, shortlist the most suitable vendors for PQC algorithms, key management, and PKI, and conduct proof-of-concept testing in your environment. This gives you a vendor comparison report and tailored recommendations to support informed decision-making. 

PQC Implementation

With the plan in place, we assist in deploying post-quantum algorithms within your infrastructure: PKI, enterprise apps, or broader ecosystems. We also enable hybrid cryptography models, ensuring seamless integration across cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments. This helps in validated interoperability, strong documentation, and hands-on training so your team can manage and maintain the system confidently. 

Pilot Testing & Scaling

Before enterprise-wide deployment, we run controlled pilot tests to validate performance and resolve integration issues. Once optimized, we support a phased rollout to replace legacy algorithms, minimize disruption, and maintain compliance. This enables smooth, scalable deployment with ongoing monitoring and optimization to keep your systems secure and future safe. 

Conclusion

The release of the first finalized NIST PQC Standards marks a turning point in the way organizations secure data. With ML-KEM, ML-DSA, and SLH-DSA already standardized, we now have a clear roadmap for building systems that can withstand the era of quantum computing. The upcoming FIPS 206 standard will further fortify our digital signature defenses. By adopting these standards early, while also designing for crypto-agility, you not only reduce the risk of “harvest-now, decrypt-later” attacks but also ensure that your infrastructure remains secure for decades to come. The sooner organizations embrace NIST PQC Standards, the better prepared they will be for a quantum future.

Whether you’re just exploring where to begin or already prepared to move into implementation, the key is to take that first step and keep building momentum. And if you’re seeking a trusted partner to guide you along the way, we’re here.

At Encryption Consulting, we’re committed to helping you move forward with clarity, confidence, and a strategy tailored to your goals. Let’s get started and ensure your organization is protected, not only today, but well into the future.

Why Your Cryptographic Inventory is Your Master Key

You can’t protect what you can’t see. While most organizations focus on visible threats like malware and hackers, the hidden layer of cryptography is often an uncharted territory. It’s the “secret sauce” that secures everything from your customer data to your financial transactions. If you don’t know what digital locks you have, you’re flying blind. Creating a comprehensive cryptographic inventory isn’t a task born of fear for the quantum era or compliance mandates, it’s a smart, proactive step to secure your business for a future where new technologies, like quantum computers, will change all the rules.  

Think of your cryptographic system as the master set of locks for your entire company. An inventory is the blueprint for that system. It gives you a clear, up-to-the-minute view of every lock, key, and safe in your digital world, so you can manage your security with confidence and foresight. This approach moves beyond the traditional CIA triad of Confidentiality, Integrity, and Authentication to build a broader sense of digital trust. It includes ensuring Validation & Trust (making sure keys are authentic), Availability (ensuring critical systems are always ready), and Proof & Accountability (having a clear record of actions). 

The Four Pillars of a Strategic Crypto Inventory

Building a comprehensive inventory is a monumental task, but it can be broken down into a structured, manageable process based on four key pillars that ensure no layer of your digital environment is overlooked. 

  • Network & Infrastructure

    This pillar focuses on both your external and internal networks. You must document all cryptography visible from outside your perimeter, like SSL/TLS certificates used for customer interactions. An inventory of these assets ensures you are using strong protocols like TLS 1.3 and renewing certificates before they expire, preventing interception of sensitive data. Internally, you must review encryption protocols for all data moving between your own systems and devices to flag outdated protocols and ensure proper configuration.

  • IT Assets & Databases

    This pillar addresses data at rest on your endpoints, servers, and storage. It involves discovering how encryption is applied across all IT assets from employee laptops to IoT devices, and ensuring they use modern, strong algorithms like AES-256. For databases, which are prime targets for cyberattacks, you must analyze encryption mechanisms and key management practices, exploring quantum-safe solutions to protect your most sensitive information for years to come.

  • Applications & Code

    This is where the most hidden cryptographic uses are found. Encryption is often embedded deep within an application’s logic. This pillar requires a thorough code review of both proprietary and third-party software to identify all encryption libraries and algorithms. The goal is to track legacy algorithms like MD5 or SHA-1 and ensure they are replaced with modern alternatives, making the foundation of your applications ready for the future. You can’t just ask your developers what they’re using, you need to use automated tools to scan your code and check software bills of materials (SBOMs) to spot weaknesses.

  • Policy & Governance

    This is the most crucial pillar for long-term success. It establishes the rules and workflows to ensure your inventory is continuously maintained, assigning clear accountability and integrating the process into existing workflows like procurement and change management. Without governance, inventory becomes a one-time snapshot that quickly becomes obsolete. With proper policy, it transforms into a living asset that continuously protects your organization against quantum threats while enabling rapid response to emerging cryptographic requirements.

Beyond a List: What to Document for a Proactive Plan

A truly comprehensive inventory goes beyond these pillars by documenting several key layers of your IT system to provide the visibility needed for a successful migration. The goal is to move from a simple asset list to a prioritized, actionable plan. Below are the key points to keep in mind when building your cryptographic inventory: 

  • Data and Device Criticality: Go beyond a simple list by documenting the business value and criticality of all sensitive data and the hardware that processes it. This is how you connect technical details to business value. 
  • Owners and Vendors: Identify who is accountable for each asset and document your vendors’ security environment, as their readiness is a direct extension of your own. 
  • Data Lifespan: Apply a “shelf-life risk model” to determine how long sensitive information needs to remain confidential. A medical record, for example, needs far more long-term protection than a temporary VPN session. This is critical for defending against the “harvest now, decrypt later” threat, where attackers steal encrypted data today, knowing a quantum computer will be able to break the encryption in the future. 
  • Crypto Details and Mitigations: Capture granular details like key sizes, protocols, and any existing mitigations to understand your baseline cryptographic health and avoid redundant work. 
  • Risk Prioritization: Combine all this information to rank assets based on their criticality, vulnerabilities, and lifespan, allowing for a data-driven conversation with leadership about where to invest first. 

This entire process is about turning raw data into a living, actionable map for your organization. It’s how you move from a reactive security environment

Overcoming the Challenges and Building Your Roadmap

Building a comprehensive inventory isn’t a simple task. Many organizations face a lack of visibility due to a knowledge gap, struggle with organizational silos that create fragmented ownership, and rely on manual processes that lead to obsolete data. However, a strategic approach turns these challenges into opportunities. 

By moving away from manual spreadsheets and using automated discovery tools, you can create a “single pane of glass” that provides a unified view of all cryptographic assets. This centralized intelligence provides the data-driven business case needed to secure executive sponsorship and gain a definitive map of your entire crypto environment.  

To build your readiness plan, follow these practical steps: 

  • Secure the Budget: Get formal buy-in from senior leadership to provide the necessary resources and backing for a project of this scale. This is a non-negotiable first step. 
  • Establish a Dedicated Team: Create a cross-functional team with key stakeholders from IT, security, and application owners to ensure alignment and break down organizational silos. 
  • Deploy Automated Discovery Tools: Use Static Analysis (SAST) and Dynamic Analysis (DAST) tools to continuously discover cryptographic assets and prevent data drift. 
  • Design a Granular Data Model & Integrate with Existing Infrastructure: Define a technical blueprint that captures essential attributes like algorithm type, key sizes, use cases, and nested dependencies, then link your inventory to existing systems like cloud key vaults and HSMs to create a holistic, centralized view. 
  • Integrate with DevSecOps: Embed the inventory process into your CI/CD pipelines for ongoing monitoring and policy enforcement. 
  • Engage Third-Party Vendors: Proactively communicate with your vendors to assess their PQC readiness and ensure they can support your migration timeline. 
  • Assess and Prioritize Assets: Use a quantitative risk model to map assets to their business context and prioritize remediation based on quantum susceptibility and data sensitivity. 

With this strategic framework, you can turn a monumental task into a clear, actionable roadmap, ensuring your organization is not just secure for today, but prepared for whatever the future holds.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

How Encryption Consulting Can Help You?

Creating a cryptographic inventory is a complicated task, but you don’t have to do it alone. At Encryption Consulting, we’re experts in applied cryptography, and we offer PQC Advisory Services designed to help businesses like yours get ready for the quantum era. 

Here’s how we can partner with you: 

  • PQC Assessment: We’ll help you find all your keys and digital assets, giving you a clear picture of your quantum risk and where to focus first. 
  • PQC Strategy & Roadmap: Based on what we find, we’ll help you build a custom, step-by-step plan to transition to quantum-safe algorithms without disrupting your business. 
  • Vendor Selection: We’ll help you choose the right tools and technology by running proof-of-concepts on your most important systems. 
  • PQC Implementation: We’ll help you smoothly integrate new, quantum-safe algorithms into your existing security setup, ensuring a seamless and secure transition. 

Conclusion

A cryptographic inventory is more than a security project; it is the foundational step for any organization seeking to prepare its digital assets for the future. By moving beyond a simple list and embracing a phased, data-driven approach, you can transform a complex challenge into a strategic advantage. The visibility and control gained from a comprehensive inventory allow you to manage business risk effectively, allocate resources efficiently, and build a resilient, crypto-agile infrastructure. This isn’t just about preparing for a theoretical future; it’s about making your organization more secure and competitive today. The time to act is now. 

CNSA 1.0 vs CNSA 2.0: Understanding the Shift and What It Means for You

The Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite (CNSA) is the U.S. National Security Agency’s official set of cryptographic algorithms for protecting National Security Systems (NSS), which are systems that handle classified and highly sensitive government information. Any compromise of these systems could have national-level consequences. 

CNSA 1.0, introduced in 2016, reflected the security requirements and threat landscape of the time. It employed well-established public key algorithms such as RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC P- 384), paired with robust symmetric encryption and secure hashing. For nearly a decade, this suite formed the cryptographic backbone of classified systems. 

However, accelerating research into quantum computing has fundamentally altered the risk profile. In response, the NSA released CNSA Suite 2.0, replacing vulnerable public key algorithms with post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) alternatives designed to withstand both classical and quantum attacks. 

Why Quantum Changes Everything

In classical computing architectures, asymmetric encryption mechanisms such as RSA and ECC remain effectively secure within the operational lifespan of protected data, assuming no breakthroughs in cryptanalysis. However, quantum computing introduces fundamentally different computation paradigms that render these assumptions obsolete. 

  • Shor’s algorithm poses a direct threat to the integrity of public-key cryptographic systems. By efficiently factoring integers and computing discrete logarithms in polynomial time, Shor’s algorithm would break both RSA and ECC in drastically reduced timeframes, a capability entirely out of reach for classical systems. 
  • Grover’s algorithm accelerates brute-force search capabilities, delivering a quadratic speed-up against symmetric key schemes. As a result, symmetric ciphers like AES must compensate by effectively doubling key lengths to preserve equivalent security margins. 

The strategic relevance of quantum-resistant cryptography is critical. The “harvest now, decrypt later” approach compels immediate action: adversaries are archiving ciphertexts today with the expectation of future decryption capability. Any delay in migrating to quantum-resilient systems risks irrevocable exposure of long-lived sensitive data. 

CNSA 2.0 is designed to neutralize this quantum threat well before large-scale quantum computing capabilities materialize.

What Stays the Same

CNSA 2.0 does not replace every algorithm. Several cryptographic primitives are already considered secure against quantum threats and continue to be supported: 

  • AES-256 remains the symmetric encryption standard across all classification levels, offering a strong security margin. 
  • SHA-384 continues as the default for general-purpose hashing, with SHA-512 also permitted where interoperability requires it. 
  • SHA-3 is not approved for broad use but is allowed in very limited contexts. Vendors may use SHA3384 or SHA3-512 for internal hardware functions that do not interoperate outside their environment, such as integrity checks in secure boot. In addition, SHA-3 is permitted when explicitly required by other approved standards, such as NIST’s LMS or XMSS. 

By keeping these algorithms in place, CNSA 2.0 ensures that much of the encryption and hashing infrastructure can remain stable, with changes focused only on areas most impacted by the post-quantum transition. 

Key Differences Between CNSA 1.0 and CNSA 2.0

The transition from CNSA 1.0 to 2.0 represents not just an algorithm swap but a fundamental change in cryptographic design and threat modeling. 

CategoryCNSA 1.0CNSA 2.0
Focus Built to strengthen existing encryption, but only against today’s threats. Designed to handle the future, especially the rise of quantum computers. 
Key Exchange Used RSA and ECDH, which are solid but vulnerable to quantum attacks. Switches to Kyber, a post-quantum algorithm, and supports hybrid mode for a safer transition. 
Digital Signatures Relied on RSA-3072 and ECDSA, strong but not quantum-resistant. Replaces them with Dilithium, faster, lighter, and quantum-safe. 
Quantum Safety Not built to survive a quantum future. Fully prepped for the post-quantum world. 
Implementation Deadline No official urgency to adopt. Must be used for top critical systems by 2035, and sooner is better. 

Enterprise Code-Signing Solution

Get One solution for all your software code-signing cryptographic needs with our code-signing solution.

Hybrid Cryptography: Bridging the Transition

The transition from CNSA 1.0 to CNSA 2.0 will not happen overnight. Hybrid cryptography plays an important role during this phase by combining a classical algorithm with a post-quantum one. For example, a hybrid key exchange might use ECDH P-384 together with ML-KEM-1024, so that even if one algorithm were broken, the system would still remain secure. 

The NSA has made it clear that CNSA 2.0 algorithms are strong enough on their own, but hybrids can be useful in certain situations. They are especially valuable when dealing with interoperability issues, such as in IKEv2, where the larger ML-KEM-1024 keys create challenges that can be solved through hybrid methods.

At the same time, hybrid approaches are not a perfect solution. They add complexity, can slow down standardization, and will eventually require another migration step when classical algorithms are phased out. Because of this, NSA only recommends hybrids where necessary, with the ultimate goal being a complete move to quantum-resistant CNSA 2.0 algorithms. 

How Encryption Consulting can Help?

Encryption Consulting helps enterprises and governments implement CNSA 2.0-aligned signing infrastructures with full PQC and hybrid crypto support.

CodeSign Secure v3.02 supports PQC out of the box, giving organizations a head start in adapting to the next era of cryptography without sacrificing usability or performance. It’s a smart move now and a necessary one for the future.

Moving to CNSA 2.0 isn’t just about selecting the right algorithm. It’s about building an end-to-end code signing strategy that protects keys, automates workflows, enforces policy, and ensures compliance. That’s exactly what CodeSign Secure was built for. 

Here’s how CodeSign Secure supports CNSA 2.0: 

  • LMS & XMSS-Ready: Already supports the post-quantum signature schemes required for software and firmware signing. 
  • HSM-Backed Key Protection: Your private keys stay protected inside FIPS 140-2 Level 3 HSMs, ensuring no exposure. 
  • State Tracking Built-In: Automatically manages state for LMS and XMSS to ensure every signature is compliant. 
  • DevOps Friendly: Integrates natively with Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps, and more. 
  • Policy-Driven Security: Use RBAC, multi-approver (M of N) sign-offs, and custom security policies to control every aspect of your code signing. 
  • Audit-Ready Logging: Get full visibility into every signing operation for easy reporting and compliance. 

Whether you’re signing software for Windows, Linux, macOS, Docker, IoT devices, or cloud platforms, CodeSign Secure is ready to help you transition safely and efficiently.  

Conclusion

CNSA 2.0 retains the proven symmetric encryption and hashing functions from its predecessor while replacing all vulnerable public key mechanisms with quantum-resistant algorithms. This forward-looking overhaul, anchored by ML-KEM for key establishment, ML-DSA for signatures, and hash-based schemes for code signing, positions National Security Systems to withstand both current and future cryptographic threats. 

With hybrid cryptography easing the migration, organizations can begin adoption now, ensuring that systems, policies, and supply chains are quantum-ready before adversaries can exploit the next great leap in computing. 

Building Your CBOM for Stronger Digital Security

A Cryptography Bill of Materials (CBOM) is an essential tool for clearly understanding your digital security, especially with powerful new computing capabilities on the horizon. A key question for organizations to ask is: how did you actually create this invaluable CBOM? 

While building a CBOM is a significant undertaking, rest assured that established guidelines and smart, automated tools are making this process more manageable and efficient than ever before.

Step 1: Set Your Objectives and Leverage What You Already Have

Before diving deep, it’s wise to define the scope of your CBOM project. Are you aiming to document every single cryptographic asset across your entire enterprise? Or, perhaps as a first step, are you focusing on your most critical systems and the areas most susceptible to future security challenges? 

Crucially, don’t start from scratch! Maximize the value of your existing resources: 

  • Your Current Asset Lists: Begin by reviewing any existing IT asset management systems or configuration databases. These provide a foundational list of your systems and applications. 
  • Your Software Component Lists: If you already maintain inventories of your software components (often called SBOMs – Software Bill of Materials), you’re in a strong position! A CBOM is specifically designed to build upon an SBOM, adding specialized cryptographic details. If you don’t have SBOMs yet, consider developing them concurrently; they provide a solid starting point for your CBOM. 

Step 2: Finding All the Cryptographic Elements

This is often the most resource-intensive, yet absolutely critical, part of the process. It involves systematically discovering every encryption algorithm, key, certificate, and secure communication protocol used across all your systems, whether it’s embedded in your applications, residing on hardware, part of device firmware, or configured within your network settings. Cryptography can be deeply embedded within digital systems, making it challenging to uncover without the right approach. 

Given the scale and complexity of most IT environments, attempting this manually with spreadsheets is simply impractical and highly prone to errors. This is where smart, automated tools become indispensable: 

  • Code and Binary Scanners: These tools “read” your software code or compiled programs to identify how cryptography is invoked and utilized. While general code analysis tools can provide some hints, specialized cryptographic discovery tools offer much more in-depth insights. For instance, tools exist that can dig into software packages (like containers) and directories to unearth these crypto pieces. 
  • Observing Live Systems: For certain cryptographic uses, especially those configured at runtime or involving dynamic negotiations, like secure website connections, it’s beneficial to observe your systems in action. These tools monitor network traffic or system behavior to capture live cryptographic details. 
  • Integrate into Your Daily Workflows: To ensure your CBOM remains continuously accurate, it’s best to weave its creation directly into your software development and deployment processes. Automated actions can generate an updated CBOM every time your team makes a code change, ensuring your inventory is perpetually current. 
  • Plugins for Existing Tools: If your team uses popular code quality platforms, specialized plugins can directly detect cryptographic assets in your source code and produce a CBOM as part of your regular quality checks. 

Step 3: What Goes Into Your CBOM?

A robust CBOM expands upon standard software component data by adding crucial cryptographic attributes. The key categories of information to capture include: 

  1. Core Software Information: This includes all the standard details from your basic software component list, such as library names, dependencies, versions, and suppliers.
  2. The “Crypto-Asset” Designation: A specific type for any cryptographic entity found.
  3. Deep Cryptographic Properties: This is where the magic happens, with attributes categorized by the type of asset:
    • Algorithms: Beyond just the name (e.g., AES), it includes its primitive (what kind of mathematical operation it performs), its variant (e.g., AES-128-GCM), the platform it’s implemented on (e.g., x86_64), any certification level it holds (e.g., fips140-3-11), its mode of operation (e.g., cbc), padding scheme (e.g., pkcs7 padding), and specific crypto functions used (e.g., keygen).
    • Certificates: Comprehensive details like the certificate’s subject and issuer names, its validity dates, the algorithm used within the certificate, its format (e.g., X.509), and any special extensions.
    • Related Cryptographic Material: Information about items like private keys or public keys, their size (in bits), format (e.g., PEM), and whether they are secured.
    • Protocols: For communication rules, it specifies details like the TLS cipher suites your systems support.
  4. Security Strength Ratings
    • Classical Security Level: How strong the crypto asset is against today’s known attack methods.
    • NIST Quantum Security Level: A crucial measure, ranging from 0 to 6, indicating how well it aligns with established security categories against powerful new computing threats.
  5. Traceability: Your CBOM also tracks which tool (the “scanner”) found the crypto asset and exactly where it was detected (file path, line numbers, etc.), which is incredibly helpful for verification and remediation.
  6. Relationship Clarity: A key feature is differentiating between when a software component simply has a crypto algorithm available (e.g., a library) versus when it’s actively using that algorithm in practice. This distinction is vital for understanding real-world risk.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

Step 4: Turning Information to Action

Once your CBOM is built and populated, you’re in a powerful position to take strategic steps toward stronger digital security: 

  1. Spot Your Vulnerabilities: Using the detailed information in your CBOM, especially the security ratings, you can systematically identify which parts of your system might be most susceptible to future security challenges. This helps you focus your efforts where they’re most needed. Be aware that upgrading cryptography in older, legacy systems can sometimes be complex! 
  2. Engage with Your Vendors: Your CBOM provides clear data for informed conversations with your software and hardware providers. Ask them directly about their plans for upgrading to more resilient cryptographic solutions. This intelligence is key to deciding if you need to switch products or partners to meet your own security timelines. 
  3. Plan Your Resources: Having a detailed CBOM helps you accurately estimate the financial investment required to upgrade your cryptographic systems across your organization, including potential software licenses, hardware refreshes, and development efforts. 
  4. Prioritize Smartly: With a clear picture of your cryptographic environment, you can strategically decide which systems require the most urgent crypto upgrades (e.g., those handling your most sensitive data or critical operations) versus those that can be addressed later. 

It’s crucial to remember that your CBOM isn’t a one-time project, it’s a living document that needs continuous attention. As your software and systems change, new applications are added, older ones are retired, and updates are installed, your CBOM must be refreshed accordingly. Automated tools are incredibly valuable here, ensuring your cryptographic environment remains accurate, strong, and ready for whatever the digital world brings next. 

By meticulously building and maintaining your CBOM, your organization gains the clarity and foresight necessary to manage cryptographic challenges proactively and secure your valuable digital assets for years to come. 

How Encryption Consulting can Help?

We are a globally recognized leader in applied cryptography, offering PQC Advisory Services designed to help organizations like yours gain full visibility and control over their cryptographic environment. 

Our services are built on a structured, end-to-end approach: 

  • PQC Assessment: We perform cryptographic discovery and inventory to locate all your keys, certificates, algorithms, and dependencies. This delivers a clear Quantum Threat Assessment and a Quantum Readiness Gap Analysis that highlights your vulnerabilities and urgent priorities. 
  • PQC Strategy & Roadmap: Based on your inventory data, we develop a custom, phased migration strategy aligned with NIST standards, incorporating a Cryptographic Agility Framework to prepare you for future changes. 
  • Vendor Evaluation and PoC: We help you identify, evaluate, and validate PQC and cryptographic management solutions through rigorous proof-of-concepts to ensure they fit your critical systems. 
  • Implementation & Integration: We seamlessly integrate PQC-ready algorithms and hybrid cryptographic models into your PKI and security ecosystem for a secure, disruption-free transition. 

With our deep expertise and proven framework, you can build, assess, and optimize your cryptographic infrastructure, ensuring both immediate resilience and long-term readiness against quantum threats.

Conclusion

Building and maintaining a CBOM is a powerful step toward strengthening your organization’s security posture. It equips you with the clarity to spot vulnerabilities, engage confidently with vendors, prioritize upgrades, and prepare for the post-quantum era. But creating a CBOM is only part of the journey, keeping it current and integrating it into your long-term cryptographic strategy is where true resilience lies. With Encryption Consulting’s expertise in cryptographic assessment, PQC strategy, and implementation, you can ensure your CBOM becomes a living, actionable tool that continuously protects your digital assets and prepares you for the challenges ahead.

Why a Cryptography Bill of Materials (CBOM) is essential now more than ever

We live in an increasingly interconnected world where digital security is paramount. Every click, every transaction, and every piece of data relies on cryptography. It’s the secure language that keeps your online banking safe, protects your personal messages, and safeguards critical infrastructure. Yet, as our software systems grow increasingly complex and powerful new computing technologies emerge, truly understanding and managing all the hidden cryptographic pieces within our digital tools has become a significant challenge. If you can’t see it, you can’t truly protect it. 

That’s where the Cryptography Bill of Materials (CBOM) comes in. 

What Exactly Is a CBOM?

You wouldn’t buy a complex product without knowing what’s inside, right? A CBOM is similar, but for your software’s security. It’s a highly detailed, machine-readable inventory that meticulously maps out every cryptographic “ingredient” embedded within your applications, systems, or products. It doesn’t just broadly state “we use encryption.” Instead, a CBOM dives deep, providing specifics like: 

  • The Exact Algorithms and Their Specifics: This means identifying not just “AES,” but its precise variant, like AES-128-GCM. This level of detail is crucial for understanding the exact security strength and how it’s implemented. It helps you distinguish between older, weaker methods and modern, robust ones. 
  • Key Strengths: Knowing the strength of your “keys” (e.g., a 2048-bit RSA key) directly indicates the resilience of your encryption. 
  • Your Digital Credentials: A CBOM lists all your digital certificates, detailing who issued them, their validity periods, the algorithms they use, and their format. 
  • Security Protocols and Rules: It specifies the secure communication “rules” your software follows, such as TLS 1.3 (the latest standard for secure web communication), and outlines the specific options it allows for secure connections. 
  • Documenting Cryptographic Elements: The CBOM aims to provide a clear inventory of all identifiable cryptographic components, including their size, format, and whether they’re adequately secured. While unearthing truly “hidden” elements can be extremely difficult, the goal of a CBOM is to provide as complete a picture as possible of all visible cryptographic assets. 

This granular detail provides unparalleled transparency. It allows you to swiftly identify any outdated or weakly configured security components and ensure your implementations meet the highest standards. It’s about proactive security management, not just reacting to incidents. 

Why a CBOM Is Essential for Your Organization Today?

The need for a CBOM is growing rapidly, driven by significant shifts in the digital security environment:

  1. Strengthening Defenses Against Attacks

    Cybercriminals are constantly enhancing their tactics, often targeting older, weaker, or improperly configured cryptographic methods that organizations might not even realize they’re using. A CBOM brings these weaknesses to light, enabling you to address them before an attacker can exploit them.

  2. Preparing for Powerful New Computing Technologies

    A major driver for adopting CBOMs is the ongoing development of highly powerful new computing capabilities. These advancements hold the potential to efficiently break many of the asymmetric cryptographic algorithms we rely on today. While these capabilities may be some years away, experts advise organizations to start preparing now.

    This is because attackers might be collecting encrypted data today, planning to decrypt it later once these powerful new computers are ready. A CBOM provides the precise map you need for this journey, showing you which of your current security methods might be vulnerable to these future threats. This allows you to plan strategically for upgrades to more resilient, next-generation cryptographic solutions.

  3. Meeting Compliance and Regulatory Demands

    Governments and industry bodies worldwide are increasingly emphasizing robust encryption practices. Regulations and mandates require organizations to clearly understand and control their cryptography. A CBOM provides solid, documented evidence of your organization’s comprehensive cryptographic posture, which is invaluable for demonstrating compliance and building trust with customers and partners.

  4. Achieving Cryptographic Agility

    The cybersecurity environment is dynamic. New vulnerabilities emerge, and stronger algorithms are developed. Cryptographic agility, which is the ability to quickly and efficiently change cryptographic algorithms or mechanisms, is vital. A comprehensive CBOM gives you the full picture, making it far easier and faster to adapt your systems when new threats or updated standards arise.

  5. Accelerating Incident Response

    Imagine a critical security flaw is discovered in a widely used encryption algorithm. Without a CBOM, identifying whether and where you’re using that vulnerable algorithm could take days or even weeks of frantic searching. With a CBOM, you can quickly pinpoint exact locations and understand your exposure, enabling a much faster, more targeted response. It also helps you verify the security practices of any software you acquire from external partners, strengthening your entire digital supply chain.

In essence, a CBOM is an advanced, specialized version of a standard software component list. While a general list (often called an SBOM) gives you a good overview, a CBOM adds that crucial, deep layer of cryptographic detail. It provides the X-ray vision for your digital security. 

Implementing a CBOM is a proactive and strategic step. It provides the clarity needed to inventory your cryptographic assets, assess potential risks, meet compliance obligations, and plan effectively for the future of digital security. In our next blog post, we’ll explore the practical steps and available tools to help your organization build its own CBOM. 

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

How Encryption Consulting can Help?

We are a globally recognized leader in applied cryptography, offering PQC Advisory Services designed to help organizations like yours gain full visibility and control over their cryptographic environment. 

Our services are built on a structured, end-to-end approach: 

  • PQC Assessment: We perform cryptographic discovery and inventory to locate all your keys, certificates, algorithms, and dependencies. This delivers a clear Quantum Threat Assessment and a Quantum Readiness Gap Analysis that highlights your vulnerabilities and urgent priorities. 
  • PQC Strategy & Roadmap: Based on your inventory data, we develop a custom, phased migration strategy aligned with NIST standards, incorporating a Cryptographic Agility Framework to prepare you for future changes. 
  • Vendor Evaluation and PoC: We help you identify, evaluate, and validate PQC and cryptographic management solutions through rigorous proof-of-concepts to ensure they fit your critical systems. 
  • Implementation & Integration: We seamlessly integrate PQC-ready algorithms and hybrid cryptographic models into your PKI and security ecosystem for a secure, disruption-free transition. 

With our deep expertise and proven framework, you can build, assess, and optimize your cryptographic infrastructure, ensuring both immediate resilience and long-term readiness against quantum threats.

Conclusion

CBOM is no longer optional, it is a necessity for organizations that want to stay secure, compliant, and resilient in the face of advancing cyber threats and emerging quantum risks. By providing a transparent, detailed inventory of your cryptographic assets, a CBOM empowers you to identify weaknesses, meet regulatory expectations, and strategically plan for a secure future. Partnering with experts like Encryption Consulting ensures that your organization not only builds an accurate CBOM but also integrates it into a broader cryptographic strategy that keeps you a step ahead of attackers and prepare for technological shifts. 

Exploring CNSA 2.0: The Core Algorithms for Next-Gen Security

Introduction

In September 2022, the National Security Agency (NSA) released the Commercial National Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite 2.0, a significant update to its cryptographic standards for protecting national security systems (NSS). This suite, updated as of May 2025, introduces quantum-resistant algorithms to counter the emerging threat of quantum computing, which could potentially break traditional cryptographic methods like RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC).

CNSA 2.0 is designed to ensure the long-term security of sensitive data, covering both classified and unclassified information used in NSS. This article explores the components of CNSA 2.0, their applications, and the transition timeline for adoption.

Background and Purpose

CNSA 2.0 updates the earlier CNSA 1.0, which was established in 2016 to replace NSA Suite B. The primary motivation for CNSA 2.0 is the advancement of quantum computing, which could render algorithms like RSA, Diffie-Hellman (DH), ECDH, and ECDSA vulnerable through Shor’s algorithm.

To address this, CNSA 2.0 incorporates post-quantum cryptographic algorithms standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and validated by the NSA. These algorithms are intended for use in all NSS, ensuring robust protection against both classical and quantum attacks.

AlgorithmFunctionSpecificationParameters
General Purpose Algorithms
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)Symmetric block cipher for information protectionFIPS PUB 197Use 256-bit keys for all classification levels.
ML-KEM (previously CRYSTALS-Kyber)Asymmetric algorithm for key establishmentFIPS PUB 203ML-KEM-1024 for all classification levels.
ML-DSA (previously CRYSTALS-Dilithium)Asymmetric algorithm for digital signatures in any use case, including signing firmware and softwareFIPS PUB 204ML-DSA-87 for all classification levels.
Secure Hash Algorithm (SHA)Algorithm for computing a condensed representation of informationFIPS PUB 180-4Use SHA-384 or SHA-512 for all classification levels.
Algorithms Allowed in Specific Applications
Leighton-Micali Signature (LMS)Asymmetric algorithm for digitally signing firmware and softwareNIST SP 800-208All parameters approved for all classification levels. LMS SHA-256/192 is recommended.
eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme (XMSS)Asymmetric algorithm for digitally signing firmware and softwareNIST SP 800-208All parameters approved for all classification levels.
Secure Hash Algorithm 3 (SHA3)Algorithm used for computing a condensed representation of information as part of hardware integrityFIPS PUB 202SHA3-384 or SHA3-512 allowed for internal hardware functionality only (e.g., boot-up integrity checks).

General-Purpose Algorithms

CNSA 2.0 includes a core set of algorithms for encryption, key exchange, digital signatures, and hashing, forming the cryptographic foundation for NSS.

Symmetric Algorithms

AES-256

The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) remains the cornerstone of symmetric encryption in CNSA 2.0. Following the FIPS PUB 197 standard, AES-256 uses 256-bit keys across all classification levels, offering maximum security against both classical and quantum threats.

This is a step up from the 128-bit keys commonly used in many current systems, providing a stronger defense against potential cryptanalytic advances. In practice, AES-256 is widely deployed across NSS for securing classified communications, protecting stored data, and enabling encrypted channels in critical defense and intelligence applications.

Asymmetric Algorithms

ML-KEM (CRYSTALS-Kyber)

For secure key establishment, CNSA 2.0 mandates the use of the Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism (ML-KEM), previously known as CRYSTALS-Kyber, standardized in FIPS PUB 203. Specifically, the ML-KEM-1024 parameter set is required for all classification levels.

ML-KEM is based on the module learning with errors (M-LWE) problem, which is believed to be resistant to quantum attacks. It replaces traditional key exchange methods like Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) and RSA, which are vulnerable to quantum computers. ML-KEM enables two parties to establish a shared secret key over an insecure channel, which can then be used for symmetric encryption.

ML-DSA (CRYSTALS-Dilithium)

For digital signatures, CNSA 2.0 specifies the Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm (ML-DSA), formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium, standardized in FIPS PUB 204. The ML-DSA-87 parameter set is mandated for all classification levels. ML-DSA ensures that digital signatures remain secure and verifiable even in a quantum computing era, replacing RSA and ECDSA signatures that could be broken by quantum algorithms. It is used for authentication and non-repudiation in various use cases, including software and firmware signing.

Hashing: SHA-384 and SHA-512

Hashing is critical for integrity verification and digital signature operations. CNSA 2.0 mandates the use of SHA-384 or SHA-512, as specified in FIPS PUB 180-4, for all classification levels. These algorithms provide a higher security margin than SHA-256, ensuring robust protection against potential cryptanalytic advances while maintaining computational efficiency for high-throughput applications.

Specialized Algorithms for Software and Firmware Signing

For applications requiring long-term security, such as software and firmware signing, CNSA 2.0 introduces hash-based signature schemes optimized for long-term integrity and robustness.

Leighton-Micali Signature (LMS) Scheme

The Leighton-Micali Signature (LMS) scheme, detailed in NIST SP 800-208, is designed for digitally signing firmware and software where signatures must remain valid for years or decades. LMS is a stateful hash-based signature scheme, meaning it uses one-time signatures and requires careful key management to ensure security.

All LMS parameter sets are approved for all classification levels, with LMS SHA-256/192 recommended for its optimal balance of security strength, computational efficiency, and implementation reliability. LMS is particularly suited for environments where hardware security modules (HSMs) are used, validated through NIST’s Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP).

eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme (XMSS)

The eXtended Merkle Signature Scheme (XMSS), also specified in NIST SP 800-208, provides another option for software and firmware signing. Like LMS, XMSS is a stateful hash-based signature scheme, offering flexibility for organizations to choose configurations based on performance requirements, signature volume, and operational constraints. All XMSS parameter sets are approved across all classification levels, making it a versatile choice for long-term security applications.

Additional Cryptographic Components

SHA-3 for Internal Hardware Functions

CNSA 2.0 authorizes SHA3-384 and SHA3-512, as per FIPS PUB 202, exclusively for internal hardware functions such as secure boot processes and hardware integrity checks. This limited use ensures modernization of internal cryptographic processes while maintaining strict interoperability standards and avoiding the complexity of broader SHA-3 deployment.

Transition Timeline and Enforcement

The transition to CNSA 2.0 is guided by specific timelines outlined in National Security Memorandum (NSM)-10:

  • Software and Firmware Signing: Organizations are encouraged to begin adopting LMS and XMSS immediately, with full adoption required by 2025 and completion by 2030.
  • Other Components: Full transition across all NSS is targeted for completion by 2035, with interim use of CNSA 1.0 algorithms permitted but CNSA 2.0 preferred.
  • Specific Milestones:
    1. Web browsers/servers and cloud services: 2025 (preferred), 2033 (mandatory).
    2. Traditional networking equipment: 2026 (preferred), 2030 (mandatory).
    3. Operating systems: 2027 (preferred), 2033 (mandatory).
    4. Niche equipment and custom/legacy systems: Update or replace by 2033.

Compliance is enforced through the Risk Management Framework (RMF) SC-12 and NSA-approved or NIAP-validated products, as per CNSSP 11. Progress is monitored under NSM-8 and NSM-10.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

Implications and Recommendations

CNSA 2.0 represents a proactive approach to securing national security systems against future quantum threats. Organizations involved in NSS should:

  • Begin Transition Planning: Start integrating CNSA 2.0 algorithms, particularly for software and firmware signing, to meet the 2025 deadline.
  • Leverage NIST Standards: Use FIPS and NIST SP standards to ensure compliance and interoperability.
  • Monitor Updates: As quantum computing evolves, further updates to CNSA 2.0 may be released, requiring ongoing vigilance.

How Encryption Consulting Supports CNSA 2.0 Adoption

Encryption Consulting provides expert guidance to navigate the transition to CNSA 2.0, ensuring your systems are quantum-resistant. Here’s a concise overview of their support process:

  • Cryptographic Discovery & Inventory: Scans your IT environment to identify cryptographic assets (certificates, keys, algorithms) across endpoints, applications, and devices, creating a detailed inventory for risk assessment.
  • PQC Assessment: Evaluates quantum readiness by analyzing vulnerabilities in systems using RSA or ECC, reviewing PKI/HSM setups, and prioritizing migration needs with a detailed report.
  • PQC Strategy & Roadmap: Designs a tailored migration plan aligned with business and CNSA 2.0 requirements, incorporating algorithm agility and a phased rollout approach.
  • Vendor Evaluation & Proof of Concept: Identifies PQC-capable vendors, defines technical requirements, and conducts PoC tests to evaluate integration and performance, delivering a vendor comparison matrix.
  • Pilot Testing & Scaling: Validates PQC solutions in controlled environments, ensuring interoperability and minimal disruption, followed by a scalable rollout with ongoing optimization.
  • PQC Implementation: Executes full-scale migration, integrating quantum-safe algorithms, providing team training, and setting up monitoring for compliance and future upgrades.

With Encryption Consulting’s expertise, organizations can confidently transition to CNSA 2.0, building a secure, future-ready cryptographic infrastructure.

Conclusion

CNSA 2.0 is a critical step toward future-proofing cryptographic security for national security systems. By adopting quantum-resistant algorithms like AES-256, ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SHA-384/512, LMS, and XMSS, the NSA ensures that sensitive data remains protected against both current and emerging threats. The rigorous validation process and clear transition timelines provide a roadmap for organizations to achieve robust, long-term security.

Navigating Hardware Barriers in the Path to Crypto-Agility 

Introduction 

In security, being able to adapt quickly is everything. With new threats like quantum computing on the horizon, this flexibility is crucial. Crypto-agility is simply the capacity to swap cryptographic algorithms and protocols swiftly without disrupting operations or risking security.

The concept emerged from lessons learned during past transitions, such as the prolonged shift from DES to AES, where Triple DES remained in use for nearly 23 years after AES was standardized. Recognizing the increasing need for seamless migration, NIST published its foundational draft, CSWP-39: Considerations for Achieving Crypto-Agility, in March 2025 and later updated to a second public draft in July 2025. This guide delves deep into operational mechanisms, trade-offs, API strategies, and systems-level planning required for effective crypto-agility.

Importance of Crypto-Agility

According to NIST’s CSWP-39, Considerations for Achieving Crypto-Agility, key challenges include backward compatibility, constant need for transition, and resource/performance constraints. For example, the SHA-1 to SHA-2 shift took years because SHA-1 was deeply embedded across protocols even after vulnerabilities were known.

Crypto-agility matters because it equips systems to:

  • Rapidly retire weak algorithms when they’re compromised
  • Scale cryptographic configurations up as threats evolve
  • Maintain operational continuity, even in high-stakes environments

Despite NIST deprecating SHA-1 for digital signatures as early as 2011, an estimated 35% of websites were still using it as late as 2016, leaving them exposed to known collision attacks.

Hardware Constraints as a Barrier to Crypto-Agility

While crypto-agility is often discussed in terms of software flexibility, in practice, the hardware capabilities of deployed devices play a decisive role in determining what can actually be achieved. This challenge is especially pronounced in Operational Technology (OT) environments, where devices are frequently built on resource-constrained embedded platforms rather than high-performance enterprise-grade systems. In simple terms, even if the software can change quickly, the hardware might not be powerful enough to handle those changes.

From a crypto-agility standpoint, these constraints make it far more complex to adopt new cryptographic algorithms or migrate in response to evolving threats. For example, transitioning to post-quantum cryptography as recommended by NIST’s PQC standardization efforts may require significantly greater processing power, memory, and bandwidth than what legacy OT hardware can provide. Some of the limitations are mentioned below:

Limited Processing Resources for Cryptographic Upgrades

Many OT devices operate on microcontrollers or processors with tight CPU and memory constraints. Introducing modern cryptographic algorithms can be computationally expensive. For instance, a TLS handshake using PQC algorithms on a medium-class microcontroller with 192 KB of RAM may consume around 35% of available memory, compared to roughly 1% for a classical elliptic-curve-based handshake.

Even if the firmware could be updated to include PQC support, the remaining memory might be insufficient for normal operation, causing stability or performance issues. In essence, the hardware resource ceiling can cap the extent to which software-based cryptographic upgrades are possible.

Hardware-Accelerated Cryptography

Modern microcontrollers and processors often include dedicated cryptographic accelerators to speed up algorithm execution and meet timing requirements. These accelerators are critical for enabling cryptographic operations on constrained devices.

However, they present two major limitations:

  • Static Algorithm Support: Once deployed, hardware accelerators generally cannot be updated to support new algorithms. If the supported algorithms are deprecated or become insecure, the device must fall back to slower, software-only implementations.
  • Unpatchable Vulnerabilities: If a flaw is found in the hardware cryptographic implementation, it cannot be patched in the field. Fixing it would require manufacturing new chips, which is an expensive and time-consuming process.

This creates a situation, though hardware acceleration, while initially beneficial, can eventually lock systems into outdated cryptographic primitives.

External Security Modules: Opportunities and Risks

In addition to processor-integrated cryptographic accelerators, many devices leverage external hardware security modules, such as Secure Elements (SEs) or Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs), to strengthen key protection and offload sensitive operations.

From a crypto-agility perspective:

  • Soldered Modules: Offer strong security but suffer the same update limitations as on-chip accelerators. Once deployed, their capabilities are fixed.
  • Exchangeable Modules: Significantly improve crypto-agility by allowing post-deployment hardware upgrades and key replacements without altering the main device hardware. This flexibility can support both implementation agility and configuration agility.

However, this modular approach comes with its own security risks:

  • Unsecured Interfaces: Communication between the host device and the module is often not cryptographically protected, making it vulnerable to tampering.
  • Module Theft: If the module is stolen, the attacker gains control of the cryptographic identity stored within, enabling impersonation attacks.
  • Human-Dependent Security Measures: Some protection mechanisms require human interaction, which is impractical in unmanned OT deployments.

External modules will see limited use in high-security OT environments until issues such as securing host-to-module communication and enabling tamper-resistant, independent operation are resolved.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

Supply Chain Hardware Limitations

Hardware used by supply chain vendors can significantly impact an organization’s ability to remain crypto-agile. Many devices, such as HSMs, IoT chips, or specialized accelerators, are built with fixed cryptographic algorithms and limited upgrade options. If vendors do not design hardware with adaptability in mind, organizations may struggle to transition to new standards or post-quantum algorithms without incurring high costs for replacement. This creates long-term dependencies on vendor roadmaps, delays security upgrades, and increases operational risk. Thus, hardware limitations in the supply chain not only slow down migration efforts but also create long-term security and operational risks.

Let’s take an example of how hardware limitations can affect cryptographic adoption. Falcon uses a trapdoor sampler based on the Fast Fourier Transformation to generate signatures. It offers very small keys and fast verification, but its signing process is much slower compared to Dilithium or traditional ECDSA. This is because Falcon requires 53-bit floating-point precision, while most embedded devices only support 32-bit floats. To compensate, higher precision must be emulated in software, which makes signing operations significantly slower.

Best Practices to mitigate challenges

The following best practices can help organizations design and maintain hardware systems that are both secure and adaptable over time:

Best PracticeTechnical ApproachWhy It Matters
Adopt Upgradable Hardware-Assisted CryptographyUse hardware that supports firmware-level updates for cryptographic algorithms. This may involve FPGA-based designs, programmable HSMs, or modular crypto accelerators with secure update channels.Allows algorithm changes (e.g., migrating from RSA/ECC to post-quantum algorithms) without replacing the entire device, reducing downtime and costs.
Secure Host-Module CommunicationsImplement cryptographically bound communication channels (e.g., mutual TLS, message authentication codes, or digitally signed command sequences) between the host system and the external crypto module.Prevents man-in-the-middle or command injection attacks that could compromise sensitive operations or keys.
Enable Modular Architecture for Algorithm and Key UpdatesDesign systems so that cryptographic components are detachable or replaceable (e.g., using PCIe crypto cards or removable secure elements).Allows easy hardware refresh cycles without impacting the rest of the OT system, extending system lifespan and supporting crypto-agility.
Implement Strong Firmware Integrity VerificationRequire firmware updates to be signed with a trusted vendor key and verify signatures within the hardware module before execution.Ensures only authenticated and approved updates are applied, preventing malicious firmware injection.
Plan for Hybrid Algorithm SupportSelect hardware that can run multiple algorithms in parallel (e.g., classical and post-quantum) during a migration phase.Minimizes operational disruption and ensures continuous interoperability during cryptographic transitions.

By following these best practices, OT operators can build cryptographic systems where hardware is not a limiting factor but an enabler for long-term security. Instead of facing costly and disruptive replacements when algorithms become obsolete, organizations can transition smoothly to newer, stronger cryptographic standards while maintaining operational uptime and compliance.

How can Encryption Consulting Help?

At Encryption Consulting, we help organizations identify hardware-related bottlenecks that could limit their ability to adapt to post-quantum algorithms.

Our process starts by assessing your organization’s current encryption environment and validating the scope of your PQC implementation to ensure it aligns with industry best practices. This initial step helps establish a solid foundation for a secure and efficient transition. Based on this assessment, we develop a strategy and roadmap tailored to the organization’s operational and compliance requirements. As part of this process, we conduct in-depth evaluations of your on-premises, cloud, and SaaS environments and integrate crypto-agile strategies, ensuring a smooth shift to quantum-safe encryption.

We also work with clients to design crypto-agile architectures that make their transition to new cryptographic standards smooth and future-ready. We assist in developing a Cryptographic Bill of Materials (CBOM) to provide a clear inventory of cryptographic assets and support algorithm transitions. The CBOM helps identify vulnerabilities, maintain transparency, and prepare for future risks. We also assist with testing and validation to ensure systems are ready for evolving cryptographic needs.

You can reach out to us at [email protected] to discuss how we can help strengthen your crypto-agility journey.

Conclusion

Achieving crypto-agility is not just about updating software when a new algorithm appears. The bigger challenge lies in building systems that are flexible and adaptable from the start. Organizations should focus on designing solutions that can support new cryptographic methods with minimal disruption to existing operations. This approach not only makes it easier to add post-quantum algorithms but also enables a faster and more effective response to emerging security threats.

In addition, crypto-agility requires maintaining clear policies, strong governance, and a well-documented inventory of all cryptographic assets in use. Continuous monitoring helps detect outdated or weak algorithms before they become a risk. Training development and security teams to work with algorithm-agnostic frameworks ensures that changes can be implemented seamlessly.

Inside the Key Ceremony: PKI, HSM, the Process, the People, and Why It Matters

When people talk about the foundations of digital trust, they usually mean encryption, certificates, and public key infrastructure (PKI). But behind all of those lies a process that very few get to witness first-hand: the key ceremony. 

A key ceremony is the formal, controlled procedure in which cryptographic key pairs are generated, distributed, and securely stored. It’s equal parts technical ritual, security safeguard, and compliance requirement. Whether for a national root certificate authority (CA), a financial institution, or a private enterprise’s offline root, the ceremony provides transparency and assurance that cryptographic systems are born under strict security controls. 

This blog will walk through the entire lifecycle of a key ceremony — from the room setup to the technical steps inside the Hardware Security Module (HSM). We’ll draw from real-world examples and standard practices, making the process both understandable and relatable. 

Why do we need Key Ceremonies?

At its core, a key ceremony ensures trustworthiness. The ceremony provides a repeatable, auditable process that eliminates doubt about how cryptographic keys are created and who has access to them. This matters because: 

  • Transparency builds trust: The process is witnessed, logged, and recorded so external auditors and relying parties can trust the system. 
  • Risk reduction: The ceremony distributes trust across multiple people using quorum-based controls.
  • Compliance: Standards like WebTrust, ETSI, and industry-specific frameworks (PCI-DSS, eIDAS, etc.) require key ceremonies. 

Think of it as the cryptographic equivalent of minting a national currency — everyone needs assurance that it’s done properly, securely, and transparently. 

Steps to a Secure Key Generation Ceremony

A key generation ceremony is a carefully controlled process designed to ensure that cryptographic keys are created, distributed, and stored with the highest level of security and trust. These ceremonies follow strict procedures, often involving multiple participants, independent validation, and detailed documentation to maintain transparency and compliance. By standardizing the process, organizations can prevent unauthorized access, reduce risks of compromise, and provide a verifiable chain of custody for critical cryptographic materials.

Step 1: Preparing the Ceremony

Key ceremonies are never improvised. They’re carefully planned and scripted to ensure nothing is left to chance. Preparation typically involves: 

  • Designating roles: Participants include a Systems Administrator, Security Officers, a CA Administrator, Witnesses, and sometimes an independent Auditor. Each role has defined responsibilities and no one person can compromise the process. 
  • Securing the environment: The ceremony usually takes place in a secured data center room or vault, with video surveillance, tamper-evident seals, and physical access restrictions. 
  • Documentation: Every step is pre-written in a Key Ceremony Script and documented in real-time during the process for audit evidence. 

The atmosphere is formal and controlled — part technical task, part ritual.

Step 2: Setting Up the Hardware Security Module (HSM) and RFS

At the heart of most ceremonies is the Hardware Security Module (HSM), the tamper-resistant device that generates and protects private keys. For nShield HSMs, there’s also an RFS (Remote File System) component. The RFS stores encrypted security world data (metadata, encrypted key material, and configuration files), while the HSMs provide the secure execution environment. 

Typical setup includes: 

  • Configuring the RFS: Ensuring it has been installed, hardened, and is dedicated to storing the Security World. 
  • Enrolling the client: Each client system that will interact with the HSM must be enrolled, ensuring it can communicate securely with the HSM cluster. This prevents unauthorized machines from attempting key operations. 
  • Testing connectivity: Commands like enquiry validate that the HSM and clients can see each other and are ready for initialization. 

This stage establishes the foundation, here you can’t create or use cryptographic keys until the HSM environment is secured and connected. 

Step 3: Creating the Security World

The Security World is the ecosystem where all cryptographic keys are created and managed. It defines the rules and protections around those keys, including quorum policies and card requirements. 

During this step: 

  1. The HSM operators initialize the Security World. 
  2. Parameters like key strength, algorithm type, and protection levels are defined. 
  3. The configuration is stored both in the HSM and encrypted on the RFS. 

This world acts as the vault where cryptographic material lives, protected by layers of controls. Without it, the HSMs can’t generate or manage secure keys.

Step 4: Defining the Quorum

One of the most important decisions in a key ceremony is setting the quorum. The quorum determines how many smart cards (Security World cards, sometimes called OCS/ACS cards) are required to unlock cryptographic material or perform sensitive actions. 

For example, in a 3-of-5 quorum, five officers each hold a card, but any three must be present together to authorize an operation. 

Why does this matter? 

  • Distributes trust: No single individual can compromise the system. 
  • Provides resilience: If one or two officers are unavailable, the system can still function. 
  • Meets compliance: Many standards require multi-party control of root keys. 

Selecting a quorum is a balancing act: too low, and you weaken security; too high, and you risk operational gridlock if not enough officers are present. 

Step 5: Personalizing and Distributing Operator Cards

Once the quorum policy is defined, operator smart cards are created and personalized. Each card is tied to an officer’s identity and protected with a PIN. 

This step ensures: 

  • Accountability: Every officer is responsible for their card. 
  • Auditability: Logs record which cards (and therefore which officers) participated in an operation. 
  • Physical control: Cards are stored securely when not in use, often in safes or lockboxes. 

This is one of the most “ritualistic” steps — cards are handed out, sealed, and logged, underscoring the shared responsibility among the participants. 

Step 6: Key Generation and Certification

With the Security World and quorum in place, the ceremony moves to the central purpose: generating the root cryptographic key pair. 

  • The root key is generated inside the HSM, ensuring the private key never exists in plaintext outside the secure boundary. 
  • The root certificate is created, which will later sign subordinate CA certificates in a hierarchical PKI model (offline root → issuing CAs → end-entity certificates). 
  • In some cases, additional keys (for signing, encrypting, or timestamping) are created as well. 

This step is the reason the entire ceremony exists: creating a trustworthy anchor of trust. 

Step 7: Documentation and Audit

Transparency is a hallmark of the ceremony. Every action is: 

  • Logged in real-time by a designated scribe. 
  • Signed by witnesses and officers. 
  • Recorded on video for compliance. 

These artifacts prove that the ceremony followed approved procedures, with no hidden shortcuts or unauthorized steps. 

Step 8: Sealing and Storage

At the conclusion, all sensitive materials are secured: 

  • Operator cards are placed into tamper-evident bags and stored in safes. 
  • RFS backups are encrypted and stored at secondary secure sites. 
  • The HSM may be powered down or sealed until the next ceremony. 

This ensures that the trust anchor — the root key — is protected against both insider and external threats. 

Customizable HSM Solutions

Get high-assurance HSM solutions and services to secure your cryptographic keys.

Why Key Ceremonies Matter Today

In an era of cloud computing, zero trust, and post-quantum cryptography, you might ask if these ceremonies still matter. The answer is yes. 

Even as technology evolves, the need for a transparent, controlled, auditable origin of cryptographic trust remains. Whether you’re securing a global DNSSEC root, a national eID system, or a corporate PKI, the ceremony is what gives everyone confidence that the cryptography holding everything together can be trusted. 

How Encryption Consulting Can Help with Your HSM Key Ceremony

Executing an HSM key ceremony isn’t just about gathering people in a secure room and generating keys. It involves careful preparation, validated procedures, strict security controls, and thorough documentation to satisfy both operational and compliance requirements. This can be overwhelming for teams managing the process for the first time — and even for organizations that perform ceremonies regularly.

Encryption Consulting provides end-to-end support to ensure your ceremony is both secure and audit-ready:

  • Ceremony Procedure Design: We work with your team to design step-by-step processes that meet industry standards, compliance requirements (such as WebTrust, PCI-DSS, and FIPS 140-2/3), and your organization’s unique security needs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation: We prepare all the necessary documents — including build books, pre-ceremony checklists, key ceremony scripts, and post-ceremony reports — ensuring the ceremony is well-structured and fully auditable.
  • Firmware & Configuration Support: Our experts assist with HSM firmware upgrades, hardware initialization, and security world setup, so your ceremony starts on a strong and validated foundation.
  • Ceremony Execution & Facilitation: We can lead or support the ceremony as officers, custodians, or witnesses, ensuring that quorum rules are enforced and every action is properly logged.
  • Training & Knowledge Transfer: We don’t just run the ceremony — we train your internal teams to understand the significance of each step, empowering them to repeat the process with confidence in the future.
  • Post-Ceremony Assurance: After the ceremony, we compile finalized documentation, validate audit requirements, and provide recommendations for long-term key management and operational security.

With Encryption Consulting by your side, organizations can minimize risk, avoid costly mistakes, and gain confidence that their cryptographic infrastructure is built on a strong and compliant foundation.

Conclusion

An HSM key ceremony is one of the most critical events in establishing a secure cryptographic environment. It combines technical expertise, strong security controls, and rigorous documentation to ensure the trustworthiness of your organization’s keys. While the process may seem complex, its purpose is clear: to safeguard your most sensitive digital assets and build a foundation of trust for your systems and users.

By understanding the steps, roles, and best practices involved, organizations can approach key ceremonies with clarity and confidence. And with expert guidance from partners like Encryption Consulting, you don’t have to navigate the process alone — you can ensure your ceremony is secure, compliant, and fully auditable from start to finish.

The Finance Industry’s Urgent Role in Preparing for the Quantum Threat

The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) has warned that while collecting and storing vast amounts of data for years is costly, the arrival of quantum computers in the next decade could make such efforts valuable for hackers. “Given the cost of storing vast amounts of old data for decades, such an attack is only likely to be worthwhile for very high-value information,” the NCSC stated.  

To this, Anne Neuberger, U.S. Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber and Emerging Technology, highlighted that “Certainly there’s some data that’s time-sensitive, like a ship transporting weapons to a sanctioned country, probably in eight years we don’t care about that anymore”. Similarly, when you make an online payment, the card data is transmitted, and banks approve or reject the transaction almost instantly. Even if someone records this data now, it wouldn’t be valuable later because the transaction is processed immediately.

This limits the risk of a “Harvest now, decrypt later” attack. However, for in-person payments using chip-and-PIN, sometimes the terminal doesn’t connect to the bank in real time (e.g., on airplanes or in remote areas). These rely on the card’s own authentication, which uses RSA/ECC. In the future, quantum computers could forge this authentication, making it possible to bypass security without bank approval. 

Considering the importance of sensitive data, financial sector must take the lead in adopting post-quantum cryptography, as the stakes are exceptionally high, a successful quantum-enabled cyberattack could compromise trillions of dollars in assets, disrupt markets, compromised card payment or PCI data. In finance industry, security upgrades take years. Cards, terminals, and backend systems must all change simultaneously, a process that can’t be done overnight.  

Understanding existing banking protocols

Most card transactions worldwide rely on the EMV standard, which covers nearly 90% of in-person payments made with cards. This standard uses asymmetric cryptography (RSA) to authenticate cards and symmetric cryptography to generate transaction certificates, ensuring the transaction is secure. 

EMV cards use three main authentication methods. Static Data Authentication (SDA) allows a card to send signed static data to prove authenticity but is vulnerable to cloning. Dynamic Data Authentication (DDA) improves security by having the card sign a challenge during a transaction, though it still leaves later transaction steps less protected. Combined Data Authentication (CDA) strengthens this process by adding further signing, making it the most secure method currently used. Offline transactions, where no live internet verification is possible, depend heavily on these authentication methods secured by public key cryptography, which is a potential risk as quantum computers could eventually forge these cryptographic protections. 

To future-proof these systems, researchers have tested Post-Quantum (PQ) Cryptography, which uses new encryption techniques designed to withstand attacks from quantum computers.

Real World Testing of PQ security

In real-world testing, NIST researchers aimed to protect card payments from future quantum computer threats by enhancing existing EMV payment protocols. They modified two standard protocols to incorporate Post-Quantum (PQ) cryptographic algorithms, which are advanced encryption methods designed to withstand quantum attacks. To ensure a smooth transition and continued usability, these new protocols were designed to work in a hybrid mode, combining existing RSA/ECC encryption with PQ algorithms. This approach maintains backward compatibility, allowing older cards and payment terminals to function without disruption during the transition to PQC. 

The updated protocols were implemented on physical banking smart cards equipped with chips, and researchers tested their performance during live payment transactions. They measured critical factors such as the memory required on the card, transaction processing time, and additional communication overhead introduced by PQ encryption. 

The card and terminal first establish a shared secret key via PQ algorithms. Then they use symmetric encryption (fast) for PIN verification and transaction certificates. Hybrid mode signs and encrypt data both with RSA/ECC and PQ algorithms. This dual protection ensures that even if PQ cryptography faces unforeseen reliability issues, card transactions remain secure and functional. 

Challenges found

Researchers encountered several challenges during the testing of quantum-safe payment cards. 

One of the biggest issues is that Post Quantum cryptography requires much larger keys and digital signatures compared to current encryption methods. This results in slower transaction times and significantly higher memory usage on banking smart cards. 

Another major limitation is hardware. Existing cards and payment terminals have restricted storage capacity and processing power, making it difficult for them to handle PQ algorithms efficiently. Replacing or upgrading this hardware is a complex task, especially given the scale of the global banking system. With billions of cards and payment terminals in use worldwide, banks cannot switch to PQ-ready systems overnight. 

Despite these hurdles, the research confirmed that it is technically feasible to secure payment cards against quantum attacks using PQ cryptography. However, performance bottlenecks and hardware constraints remain significant obstacles. The findings highlight the urgency of beginning hardware preparation and upgrades now, ensuring that the financial industry is ready before quantum computers become advanced enough to break current RSA and ECC cryptographic systems. 

Preparing for PQC

Following roadmap created in partnership with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) to guide organizations in preparing for Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). It highlights the need to transition from current cryptographic methods (like RSA/ECC) to quantum-resistant algorithms before quantum computers become powerful enough to break existing encryption. 

  1. Engagement with Standards Organizations

    Organizations are advised to direct their key stakeholders to increase their engagement with standards developing organizations, such as NIST, PCI-DSS for latest developments relating to necessary algorithm and dependent protocol changes.

  2. Inventory of Critical Data

    Every organization holds some data that, if decrypted in the future, could cause serious harm. This includes sensitive personal information (cryptography is used across their infrastructure. This includes listing all software, hardware, and applications relying on encryption. Once this inventory is complete, teams can evaluate which cryptographic methods are vulnerable to quantum attacks and estimate the costs and effort required to replace them with quantum-safe alternatives. Without this step, organizations risk overlooking hidden vulnerabilities.

  3. Identification of Internal Standards

    Internal cryptographic standards and policies, define how an organization manages encryption, purchases technology, and maintains data protection policies. These rules were built around current encryption methods like RSA and ECC. With the shift to post-quantum cryptography, these internal standards will need updating to align with future security requirements. This means revising cryptographic controls, policies, standards, SLA’s , and internal compliance measures to ensure that, when PQC is implemented, it’s fully supported within organizational processes.

  4. Identification of Public Key Cryptography

    From the inventory, organizations should identify where and for what purpose public key cryptography is being used and assess which systems are most vulnerable to quantum threats.

  5. Prioritization of Systems for Replacement

    Not every system needs to be upgraded immediately, so prioritization is crucial. Prioritizing one system over another for cryptographic transition is highly dependent on organization functions, goals, and needs. To supplement prioritization efforts, organizations should consider the following factors when evaluating a quantum vulnerable system:

    • Is the system a high value asset based on organizational requirements?
    • What is the system protecting (e.g., key stores, passwords, root keys, signing keys, personally identifiable information, sensitive personally identifiable information)?
    • What other systems does the system communicate with?
    • To what extent does the system share information with federal entities?
    • To what extent does the system share information with other entities outside of your organization?
    • Does the system support a critical infrastructure sector?
    • How long does the data need to be protected?
  6. Plan for Transition

    Using the inventory and prioritization information, organizations should develop a strategy for systems transitions upon publication of the new post-quantum cryptographic standard. Transition plans should consider creating cryptographic agility to facilitate future adjustments and enable flexibility in case of unexpected changes. Cybersecurity officials should provide guidance for creating transition plans.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

Current estimate of the amount of funding required

Federal agencies, working with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Office of the National Cyber Director (ONCD), in collaboration with CISA and NIST, are taking structured steps to secure U.S. Government information technology against future quantum computing threats. The effort centers on three main activities. 

  1. Developing an initial inventory of cryptographic systems present on agency information systems (other than national security systems (NSS));  
  2. Developing cost estimates for the transition; and 
  3. Developing prioritization criteria for the transition. 

Each year, agencies must submit to OMB and ONCD an updated inventory detailing quantum-vulnerable cryptography on their prioritized systems along with migration cost estimates. Based on the latest data, ONCD projects that the total cost for transitioning prioritized federal systems to PQC between 2025 and 2035 will reach approximately $7.1 billion (in 2024 dollars). Meanwhile, the Department of Defense, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National Manager for NSS are separately estimating funding needs to migrate classified and defense systems. 

These early projections carry a high degree of uncertainty, as agencies are still refining their inventories and cost models. The estimates are currently a rough order of magnitude, not exact calculations. Agencies will continue to revise these numbers annually as they gain experience and improve their methodologies. 

A significant challenge identified is that some federal systems cannot easily adopt new cryptographic algorithms because they are hardwired in hardware or firmware or lack the capacity to handle replacements. Replacing these systems entirely contributes substantially to the overall projected cost of migration. 

How can Encryption Consulting support PQC transition?

If you are wondering where and how to begin your post-quantum journey, Encryption Consulting is here to support you. You can count on us as your trusted partner, and we will guide you through every step with clarity, confidence, and real-world expertise.   

Cryptographic Discovery and Inventory

This is the foundational phase where we build visibility into your existing cryptographic infrastructure. We identify which systems are at risk from quantum threats and assess how ready your current setup is, including your PKI, HSMs, and applications. The goal is to identify what cryptographic assets exist, where they are used, and how critical they are. Comprehensive scanning of certificates, cryptographic keys, algorithms, libraries, and protocols across your IT environment, including endpoints, applications, APIs, network devices, databases, and embedded systems. 

Identification of all systems (on-prem, cloud, hybrid) utilizing cryptography, such as authentication servers, HSMs, load balancers, VPNs, and more. Gathering key metadata like algorithm types, key sizes, expiration dates, issuance sources, and certificate chains. Building a detailed inventory database of all cryptographic components to serve as the baseline for risk assessment and planning. 

PQC Assessment

Once visibility is established, we conduct interviews with key stakeholders to assess the cryptographic landscape for quantum vulnerability and evaluate how prepared your environment is for PQC transition. Analyzing cryptographic elements for exposure to quantum threats, particularly those relying on RSA, ECC, and other soon-to-be-broken algorithms. Reviewing how Public Key Infrastructure and Hardware Security Modules are configured, and whether they support post-quantum algorithm integration. Analyzing applications for hardcoded cryptographic dependencies and identifying those requiring refactoring. Delivering a detailed report with an inventory of vulnerable cryptographic assets, risk severity ratings, and prioritization for migration. 

PQC Strategy & Roadmap

With risks identified, we work with you to develop a custom, phased migration strategy that aligns with your business, technical, and regulatory requirements. Creating a tailored PQC adoption strategy that reflects your risk appetite, industry best practices, and future-proofing needs. Designing systems and workflows to support easy switching of cryptographic algorithms as standards evolve. Updating security policies, key management procedures, and internal compliance rules to align with NIST and NSA (CNSA 2.0) recommendations. Crafting a step-by-step migration roadmap with short-, medium-, and long-term goals, broken down into manageable phases such as pilot, hybrid deployment, and full implementation. 

Vendor Evaluation & Proof of Concept

At this stage, we help you identify and test the right tools, technologies, and partners that can support your post-quantum goals. Helping you define technical and business requirements for RFIs/RFPs, including algorithm support, integration compatibility, performance, and vendor maturity. Identifying top vendors offering PQC-capable PKI, key management, and cryptographic solutions. Running PoC tests in isolated environments to evaluate performance, ease of integration, and overall fit for your use cases. Delivering a vendor comparison matrix and recommendation report based on real-world PoC findings. 

Pilot Testing & Scaling

Before full implementation, we validate everything through controlled pilots to ensure real-world viability and minimize business disruption. Testing the new cryptographic models in a sandbox or non-production environment, typically for one or two applications. Validating interoperability with existing systems, third-party dependencies, and legacy components. Gathering feedback from IT teams, security architects, and business units to fine-tune the plan. Once everything is tested successfully, we support a smooth, scalable rollout, replacing legacy cryptographic algorithms step by step, minimizing disruption, and ensuring systems remain secure and compliant. We continue to monitor performance and provide ongoing optimization to keep your quantum defense strong, efficient, and future-ready. 

PQC Implementation

Once the plan is in place, it is time to put it into action. This is the final stage where we execute the full-scale migration, integrating PQC into your live environment while ensuring compliance and continuity. Implementing hybrid models that combine classical and quantum-safe algorithms to maintain backward compatibility during transition. Rolling out PQC support across your PKI, applications, infrastructure, cloud services, and APIs. Providing hands-on training for your teams along with detailed technical documentation for ongoing maintenance. Setting up monitoring systems and lifecycle management processes to track cryptographic health, detect anomalies, and support future upgrades. 

Transitioning to quantum-safe cryptography is a big step, but you do not have to take it alone. With Encryption Consulting by your side, you will have the right guidance and expertise needed to build resilient, future-ready security posture.  

Reach out to us at [email protected] and let us build a customized roadmap that aligns with your organization’s specific needs. 

Conclusion

In conclusion, the transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography is becoming critical for the financial sector as future quantum computers could break current encryption methods that secure card payments, banking systems, and digital transactions. Research has already shown it is technically feasible to build quantum-resistant payment protocols, but challenges such as larger cryptographic keys, slower processing speeds, and costly hardware upgrades remain. Preparing early, by inventorying systems, testing hybrid encryption models, and aligning with upcoming NIST standards, will be essential to protect sensitive financial data and ensure uninterrupted trust in global payment networks when quantum computing becomes a reality. 

Decrypting the NIST-Approved Algorithms for Enterprises 

Introduction 

Quantum computing is no longer an abstract concept reserved for theoretical physics or advanced research labs. With companies like IBM, Google, and academic institutions pushing quantum boundaries, cryptographically-relevant quantum computers (CRQC), capable of breaking widely used encryption (like RSA-2048 or ECC-256), may arrive within decades, or sooner. 

The main threat to today’s encryption does not lie in immediate vulnerabilities, but in the future arrival of quantum computers, which will make currently secure algorithms like RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) outdated. Attackers are already collecting encrypted data with the expectation that quantum computing breakthroughs, such as Shor’s algorithm, will eventually enable them to decrypt this information, thereby putting sensitive long-term data (like PCI, PHI, PII, intellectual property, and classified records) at risk. To protect against this imminent threat, organizations need to proactively adopt post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and incorporate quantum-resistant solutions into their security and compliance strategies. 

In response, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) initiated a multi-year project to standardize quantum-resistant cryptography. The final selection in 2024 introduced new algorithms designed to replace or supplement vulnerable ones. These new primitives, which are based on hard lattice problems and hash-based constructs, represent a significant shift in how businesses should approach cryptographic security. 

This blog deciphers those algorithms, evaluates their strengths, and maps a migration strategy for enterprises. 

NIST’s Post-Quantum Cryptography Initiative 

Why did NIST take the lead? 

NIST’s post-quantum cryptography (PQC) project began in 2016 to identify and standardize encryption and signature schemes resistant to quantum attacks. The aim was to evaluate various PQC candidates, focusing on two primitives: key agreement (which includes key exchange, public key encryption, and key encapsulation mechanisms, or KEMs) and digital signatures. The public competition attracted 69 submissions, in which the world’s best cryptographers participated in multiple rounds of evaluation, which reduced the number of candidates. After this evaluation phase, a minimum of one algorithm for each of these primitives was selected, which would be “capable of protecting sensitive government information well into the future, including after the advent of quantum computers.”  

The focus on those two factors was necessary because asymmetric encryption algorithms like RSA and ECC rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers and solving discrete logarithm problems, tasks that quantum computers could solve efficiently using Shor’s algorithm. Consequently, sufficiently powerful quantum computers could decrypt data secured by these algorithms, exposing sensitive information. 

In contrast, symmetric encryption methods such as AES are less vulnerable to quantum attacks. While quantum algorithms like Grover’s algorithm could reduce the effective security of symmetric encryption, it would still be significantly harder to break than asymmetric encryption. For example, the key size of AES-256 would only be halved in strength against quantum attacks, meaning AES-256 would remain highly secure even as quantum computing advances. This inherent resilience makes symmetric algorithms a durable component of future cryptographic security. 

Evaluation Criteria 

Each candidate algorithm was meticulously evaluated according to NIST’s post-quantum cryptography standardization process, using the following criteria: 

  • Security

    Security was the most important consideration in the evaluation process. Algorithms were assessed on their resilience against both classical and quantum attacks, with a particular focus on the security they provide in practical public-key cryptographic applications such as digital signatures and key establishment. NIST evaluated schemes according to multiple strength categories aligned with existing symmetric cryptography security levels, ensuring candidates could withstand adversaries with varied computational resources.

    Additional properties, such as perfect forward secrecy, which ensures that session keys remain secure even if long-term keys are compromised, were also factored in. The thorough security analysis ensured that the chosen algorithms would effectively protect sensitive information well into the future, even against breakthroughs in cryptanalysis or advancement in quantum computing capabilities.

  • Cost

    Cost considerations encompassed the performance and resource requirements of the algorithms. NIST evaluated both hardware and software efficiencies for critical operations, including key generation, encryption/encapsulation, signing, decryption/decapsulation, and verification. Important metrics included the sizes of public keys, ciphertexts, and signatures, as these directly affect bandwidth, storage, and compatibility, especially in constrained environments or protocols with limited packet sizes.

    The evaluation also examined computation time differences between public and private key operations, examining use cases ranging from resource-limited devices like smartcards to high-traffic servers. Additionally, the rate of decryption failures, where ciphertexts might fail to decrypt properly, was analyzed to understand the impacts on reliability and performance.

  • Algorithm and Implementation Characteristics

    This criterion focused on adaptability, ease of implementation, and resilience against side-channel attacks. Algorithms were evaluated for their adaptability in adjusting security settings, compatibility with a range of platforms, including embedded devices and massive servers, and resilience to implementation flaws like power analysis or timing attacks. The complexity of algorithm designs and their demands on secure coding practices were key factors, as ensuring safe and efficient implementations is critical to overall security. NIST aimed to select algorithms that balance strong security assurances with practical deployment considerations, enabling broad and effective adoption.

Together, these criteria ensured that NIST’s post-quantum cryptography standards are not only mathematically secure but also operationally feasible, scalable, and resilient against emerging threats in the quantum era. 

Finalists were split into two categories: 

  • Standardization-ready algorithms 
  • Alternatives that show promise but require further study 

In July 2022, NIST announced its intent to standardize the following algorithms: 

  • CRYSTALS-Kyber: for key establishment (KEM) 
  • CRYSTALS-Dilithium and Falcon: for digital signatures 
  • SPHINCS+: a conservative, stateless hash-based signature scheme 

The final standards were officially published as FIPS drafts in 2024, with production-grade implementation recommendations to follow. In addition to the core algorithms, Falcon, a compact, high-security signature scheme, and HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic), a code-based key encapsulation mechanism that provides important algorithmic diversity, are scheduled for standardization shortly. HQC is progressing under IR 8545 and is expected to be finalized around 2027. These algorithms will complement the existing suite, offering enterprises additional options for a secure, quantum-resistant cryptographic infrastructure. 

Deep Dive into NIST-Approved Algorithms 

CRYSTALS-Kyber (ML-KEM) 

CRYSTALS-Kyber, a lattice-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM), is particularly critical for enterprises seeking to secure communication protocols such as TLS, SSH, and VPNs against quantum threats

  • Category: Module-LWE(Learning With Errors)-based lattice cryptography 
  • Security Strength: 128-bit, 192-bit, and 256-bit levels 
  • Performance: One of the fastest PQC KEMs available 

Kyber is designed for key encapsulation and is ideal for TLS, SSH, and other protocols requiring ephemeral session key exchange. Its performance is comparable, or superior, to classical Diffie-Hellman in both speed and size. Its lattice foundation resists quantum and classical attacks and has been extensively vetted by academic cryptanalysts. 

Enterprise Relevance

  • TLS Integration: Kyber is being tested in hybrid modes with X25519 and RSA. Enterprises running large-scale TLS infrastructures (e.g., banking portals, SaaS platforms) can begin experimenting with Kyber in test environments using OpenSSL PQC branches.
  • IoT Devices: Efficient enough for resource-constrained environments, allowing future-proofing of secure firmware updates. 

Migration Strategy 

  • Enable hybrid key exchanges (e.g., Kyber + X25519) in pilot environments. 
  • Prioritize securing communications between critical systems, databases, API gateways, and authentication servers. 

CRYSTALS-Dilithium (ML-DSA) 

  • Category: Based on structured lattices (MLWE(Module Learning With Errors), Module-SIS). 
  • Security Strength: 128-bit, 192-bit, and 256-bit levels 
  • Performance: Faster signing and verification than RSA and ECDSA

Dilithium is fast, side-channel resistant, and has simple constant-time implementations. It balances key and signature size with high efficiency, making it suitable for digital identity use, including X.509 certificates, code signing, and IoT firmware authentication. 

Enterprise Relevance

  • Resilient for Enterprise PKI and Digital Signatures: Dilithium’s efficient performance and strong post-quantum security properties make it highly suitable for securing digital signatures in enterprise workflows, such as document signing, software updates, and identity assertions. 
  • Ease of Integration Across Infrastructure: Its design supports deterministic signatures and straightforward key management, simplifying integration into legacy systems, cloud-native services, and CI/CD pipelines without adding cryptographic complexity. 
  • Ready for Compliance and Standardization: As a NIST-approved algorithm with stable implementation libraries, Dilithium aligns with regulatory requirements and enterprise crypto-agility strategies, making it a dependable long-term choice. 

Migration Strategy 

  • Conduct signing throughput and storage tests using both Dilithium and FALCON. 
  • Run simulations for firmware update cycles using these schemes to evaluate real-world cost. 

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

SPHINCS+ (SLH-DSA) 

SPHINCS+ is a stateless hash-based digital signature scheme that provides strong security guarantees based solely on hash functions. Unlike lattice-based approaches, SPHINCS+ does not rely on assumptions beyond those used in classical hash functions, making it highly conservative and resilient against a broad range of future cryptanalytic breakthroughs. 

  • Category: Hash-based (SHA-256/SHA-3) 
  • Security Strength: SPHINCS+-128 / -192 / -256 
  • Performance: Slow signing and verification 

SPHINCS+ is not the most efficient post-quantum signature algorithm. Still, its strength lies in its minimal reliance on complex math or algebraic structures, which makes it extremely resilient—even if other classes of algorithms break. 

Enterprise Relevance

  • Long-Term Archival Integrity: SPHINCS+ is ideal for digitally signing long-term documents or records where durability of trust is paramount and futureproofing against unforeseen cryptographic advances is essential. 
  • Regulatory and Legal Document Signing: Its deterministic and stateless nature makes it attractive for audit trails, regulatory filings, and legal attestation workflows that must remain verifiable for decades. 
  • High-Assurance Environments: Enterprises in defense, legal, scientific, or government sectors that require highly conservative security postures may adopt SPHINCS+ as a backup or alternative to lattice-based schemes, enhancing cryptographic agility. 

Migration Strategy

  • Use SPHINCS+ selectively for high-assurance, low-throughput applications. 
  • Incorporate it as a fallback in hybrid certificate chains, especially for archival PKI or timestamping services. 
  • Evaluate performance constraints and adopt non-interactive, time-insensitive systems where signature size is manageable. 

Falcon (FN-DSA) 

Falcon (Fast Fourier Lattice-based Compact Signatures) is a post-quantum signature scheme designed for high security with small signature sizes, making it particularly useful for applications that require bandwidth efficiency and strignent data constraints. 

  • Category: NTRU lattice + Fast Fourier sampling 
  • Security Strength: Falcon-512 (≈128-bit), Falcon-1024 (≈256-bit) 
  • Performance: High verification speed; slower signing due to numerical complexity 

Falcon achieves compactness through its advanced mathematical structure involving discrete Gaussian sampling over lattices. Though computationally heavier on the signing side, it offers very fast verification and compact signatures, making it attractive for authentication in constrained environments and massive-scale digital operations. 

Enterprise Relevance

  • Code Signing and Secure Boot Chains: Falcon’s compact signature size is well-suited for signing firmware and software packages, especially where bandwidth and storage are constrained (e.g., embedded systems, automotive ECUs, IoT). 
  • PKI Authentication: Its high-speed verification is beneficial for high-throughput certificate validation (e.g., in SSL offloading appliances or identity assertion in authentication flows). 
  • Edge and CDN Deployments: Falcon’s small signature size reduces payload overhead across globally distributed nodes, making it ideal for CDN nodes, edge devices, and lightweight identity verification at the perimeter. 

Migration Strategy

  • Begin Falcon integration in systems prioritizing signature compactness (e.g., edge compute and embedded firmware). 
  • Pair Falcon with hybrid-signature models (e.g., Falcon + ECDSA) in PKI environments for gradual rollout and compatibility assurance. 
  • Test Falcon in software signing workflows to ensure signing latency is within operational thresholds. 

HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic) 

HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic) is a code-based Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) that derives its security from the hardness of decoding a random linear code in the Hamming metric. It is one of the the three algorithms selected by NIST for standardization in post-quantum encryption and key exchange. 

  • Category: Code-based cryptography (Indistinguishability under chosen ciphertext attack – IND-CCA) 
  • Security Strength: HQC-128 / HQC-192 / HQC-256 
  • Performance: Efficient key generation and encapsulation; relatively large ciphertext and public key sizes 

HQC is built on decades-old error-correcting code theory and provides strong security assurances based on well-studied hard problems. Its design emphasizes simplicity and resistance to known quantum attacks. 

Enterprise Relevance

  • Secure Key Exchange Over Untrusted Channels: HQC is ideal for establishing cryptographic session keys in environments such as TLS, VPNs, SSH, and encrypted messaging, ensuring forward secrecy against quantum adversaries. 
  • Reliable in Low-Trust Infrastructure: HQC is resilient in hostile or distorted communication settings, including satellite communications, IoT networks, and distant field equipment, due to its dependence on error-correcting codes and low cryptographic assumptions. 
  • Hybrid Cryptography in Enterprise PKI: HQC is well-suited for use in hybrid certificate chains alongside classical algorithms (e.g., RSA or ECC), providing quantum-safe assurance without breaking legacy compatibility. 
  • Operational Flexibility: Compared to lattice-based KEMs like Kyber, HQC offers strong IND-CCA2 (Indistinguishability under Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack) security, constant-time operations, and resistance to certain side-channel and timing attacks, making it attractive for high-assurance environments. 

Migration Strategy 

  • Integrate HQC in Hybrid Key Exchange: Use HQC alongside traditional algorithms (e.g., ECDH) in TLS 1.3 or QUIC(Quick UDP Internet Connections) using hybrid schemes like [x25519-HQC] to ensure post-quantum security while retaining backward compatibility. 
  • Evaluate Bandwidth Impact: Account for relatively large public key and ciphertext sizes when deploying HQC in bandwidth-sensitive or embedded environments. Employ compression or selective deployment where needed. 
  • Pilot in Quantum-Resilient VPN or TLS Gateways: Begin testing HQC in internal VPNs, TLS terminators, or edge infrastructure, where you can control the environment and assess performance under load. 
  • Deploy HQC in Long-Term Secure Messaging: For internal messaging or email encryption systems requiring forward secrecy and long-term confidentiality, HQC offers a viable option alongside other NIST PQC finalists. 

Comparing the Algorithms: Suitability and Trade-Offs 

Algorithm Use Case Public Key Size Signature/Ciphertext Strengths Limitations 
Kyber TLS, VPNs, key exchange ~800 bytes ~1kB ciphertext Fast, compact, hybrid-ready KEM-only 
Dilithium Code signing, certificates ~1.5kB ~2.5kB signature Side-channel resistant, efficient Larger sigs 
Falcon Lightweight signing ~1kB ~600–1,200B signature Compact sigs, high performance Complex to implement 
SPHINCS+ Long-term sigs, archival ~1kB 8–30kB High assurance, conservative Very large sigs, slow 

Each PQC algorithm makes different trade-offs in speed, signature/key size, and ease of implementation. For example, Falcon is optimal for protocols requiring small signatures (e.g., DNSSEC), Dilithium is suitable for code signing and certificates, and Kyber is designed for key encapsulation in secure communications such as TLS. SPHINCS+ is favored when long-term security and conservative design are paramount, despite its larger signatures and slower performance. 

How PQC Algorithms Will Replace Today’s Widely Used Algorithms 

As quantum computing advances, the legacy public key cryptosystems, RSA, Diffie-Hellman, and ECC, will be phased out due to their vulnerability to Shor’s algorithm and similar attacks. The transition plan includes: 

  • Direct Replacement: PQC Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) such as Kyber will replace RSA and ECC in protocols like TLS for secure key exchange. 
  • Digital Signatures: Schemes like Dilithium and Falcon are set to replace classic digital signature algorithms (RSA/ECDSA) in code signing, digital certificates, and document authentication. 
  • Hybrid Approaches: Initially, many applications will deploy hybrid cryptography, combining classical and PQC schemes to ensure backward compatibility and defense in depth during the migration period. 
  • Rollback Algorithms: If vulnerabilities are discovered in the new PQC algorithms before they become widespread, rollback mechanisms or alternate PQC candidates (recently evaluated in NIST’s process) may be rapidly adopted as contingency measures. 

Organizations should plan for phased integration, updating libraries and infrastructure to support both classic and quantum-safe algorithms, and prepare to manage certificate lifecycles that mix legacy and PQC credentials. Early preparation is key to protecting data against future quantum threats and complying with emerging security standards. 

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

What Is Expected to Change Due to PQC?

The transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) will have far-reaching effects on both the technology landscape and security best practices. Several key changes are anticipated: 

  • Protocol and Algorithm Updates: Many widely used security protocols (such as TLS, SSH, and VPN standards) will need to integrate new PQC algorithms. Unlike traditional upgrades, the shift isn’t just “plug-and-play”; adoption may require significant updates to protocol specifications and implementations. 
  • Larger Cryptographic Keys and Artefacts: Public keys, ciphertexts, and digital signatures produced by PQC algorithms are often larger than their RSA or ECC counterparts. This increase in size can introduce challenges related to network bandwidth, storage, and computational efficiency, particularly for embedded or resource-constrained environments. 
  • Migration from Diffie-Hellman and Traditional Key Exchange: Protocols relying on Diffie-Hellman or elliptic-curve Diffie-Hellman for key exchange will need to move toward key encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs), such as Kyber, that are secure against quantum attacks. 
  • Hybrid Implementations: Given the relative maturity and vetting of existing algorithms compared to new PQC options, many applications will adopt hybrid models, combining classical and quantum-resistant schemes. This approach provides defense in depth and supports a smoother migration period as confidence in PQC grows. 
  • Implementation Confidence and Vigilance: Since PQC algorithms are newer and have not undergone as many years of real-world cryptanalysis as RSA/ECC, ongoing analysis and monitoring are critical. Organizations must remain flexible to allow rapid mitigation if weaknesses are discovered in the future. 

These changes underscore the need for crypto-agility, the ability to rapidly and seamlessly swap cryptographic algorithms and protocols without disrupting infrastructure or workflows. Crypto-agility will be a foundational capability for organizations navigating the uncertainties of PQC adoption and ongoing cryptographic evolution. 

Practical Implementation Considerations

Hardware Readiness and Platform Compatibility 

While NIST-approved PQC algorithms are mostly designed for software efficiency, hardware support is a growing concern: 

  • CRYSTALS-Kyber and Dilithium were selected partly for their implementation simplicity. They avoid floating-point math, making them efficient on general-purpose CPUs, ARM microcontrollers, and embedded SoCs. This makes them ideal for enterprise servers, desktops, and IoT devices. 
  • Falcon, on the other hand, uses Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) and Gaussian sampling, requiring high-precision floating-point operations. Insecure implementations can leak private keys due to side-channel attacks unless they are carefully implemented in constant time. For secure use, Falcon may need hardware acceleration or software libraries with rigorous side-channel protections. 
  • Some Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) and Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) are beginning to support PQC algorithms, but adoption is slow. Enterprises should evaluate vendors for upcoming PQC firmware support. 

Life Cycle and Certificate Management 

  1. CSR Sizes: With the adoption of post-quantum algorithms such as Dilithium, certificate signing requests (CSRs) will naturally become larger due to bigger public keys (e.g., around 1.5kB). This presents an opportunity for organizations to modernize their PKI infrastructure, update bandwidth planning, and adjust API limits as part of future-proofing security operations.
  2. Certificate Bloat: Certificates embedded with post-quantum public keys (especially in hybrid mode with both ECC and PQC) will be significantly larger. This may affect:
    • TLS handshake times: Because HQC signatures are larger than traditional ones, transmitting them during the TLS handshake may increase the time taken to establish secure connections, particularly over slower networks or when many concurrent connections are initiated.
    • Certificate transparency log sizes: CT logs maintain records of issued certificates. Larger signatures increase the overall certificate size, resulting in higher storage and processing requirements in CT logs.
    • OCSP and CRL distribution: Both Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses and Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) carry certificate data. Larger public key and signature sizes can expand the size of these responses/lists, leading to higher bandwidth and processing costs for certificate status checking.
  3. Signature Verification Performance: While Kyber and Dilithium are efficient, SPHINCS+ can dramatically increase the time required for signature generation and verification. Enterprises must benchmark certificate validation performance, especially on client devices and mobile platforms.

Regulatory Mandates 

As PQC adoption becomes mandated: 

  • Enterprises operating under regulatory standards or compliance frameworks such as PCI DSS, FIPS 140-3, NIST, NIS 2, HIPAA, etc., will face enforcement of PQC-readiness. As PQC requirements are enforced, compliance audits will no longer stop at verifying encryption strength but will require evidence of quantum-safe readiness. This means organizations must maintain a comprehensive algorithm inventory, detailing all cryptographic algorithms currently in use across systems, applications, APIs, databases, and network components.
  • Additionally, auditors will expect a clearly defined transition timelinethat outlines outlining when and how existing classical algorithms such as RSA and ECC, will be replaced with NIST-approved PQC algorithms, including CRYSTALS-Kyber (for key exchange) and Dilithium (for digital signatures). These steps will ensure organizations can demonstrate proactive measures toward quantum resilience during regulatory reviews. 
  • Standards bodies like ISO, ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) are already working on PQC-compatible updates for X.509, TLS, and S/MIME. Enterprises must track these updates for legal admissibility, liability protection, and forward-compatibility. 

Enterprise Use Cases and PQC Application Scenarios 

Enterprises should evaluate PQC adoption based on the sensitivity and longevity of their cryptographic use cases. As the transition to post-quantum cryptography unfolds, embracing crypto agility, the ability to quickly swap cryptographic algorithms, will be critical for maintaining forward security without disrupting legacy systems. Considering hybrid implementations, which combine classical and quantum-safe algorithms, will also be crucial. Below are specific scenarios where NIST-approved algorithms map directly to enterprise workflows: 

  • TLS/SSL in Web Infrastructure: One of the most critical areas impacted by the quantum threat is web infrastructure, where TLS is a foundational protocol for secure communications. Traditionally, TLS relies on public key algorithms such as RSA or elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) for key exchange, both of which are rendered insecure by quantum computers. Adopting Kyber as part of a hybrid key exchange (for example, combining Kyber with X25519 or ECDHE) enables organizations to negotiate secure session keys that are resistant to both classical and quantum attacks. This approach is already supported in modern cryptographic libraries like OpenSSL 3.0, which integrates the Open Quantum Safe (OQS) project, and has been trialed in browsers like Google Chrome. While there may be a minor increase in certificate size and a slight latency overhead (typically 2–5ms), the performance of Kyber’s encapsulation is faster than legacy RSA-2048, making it a highly practical quantum-safe upgrade for web platforms.
  • Code Signing and Software Distribution: With the rising threats of quantum-enabled adversaries, code signing and secure software distribution become pivotal. If attackers gain quantum capabilities, they could forge ECDSA or RSA signatures, enabling potentially catastrophic supply chain attacks. To mitigate this risk, enterprises should transition to PQC digital signature schemes such as Dilithium or Falcon for signing software updates. During the migration phase, hybrid signatures can be used, combining both classical and PQC signatures to ensure backward compatibility and enhanced security. Practical tools that integrate these signatures make it feasible to protect mobile application updates, container images, and other distributed code. This secures the entire software delivery lifecycle against future quantum threats.
  • IoT and Embedded Firmware: Internet of Things (IoT) and embedded devices face unique challenges, including limited memory, processing power, and the need for efficient over-the-air updates. For these environments, the compact nature of Falcon signatures (as small as 666 bytes) and the efficiency of Kyber for key establishment make them excellent choices. By adopting these algorithms, manufacturers can ensure that devices such as smart meters, home routers, and wearables can securely authenticate firmware updates, protecting critical infrastructure even in highly resource-constrained scenarios
  • PKI and Identity Management: Enterprise identity infrastructures, such as those underpinning Active Directory, S/MIME for secure email, or smart cards for authentication, all depend on a strong Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). Migrating these systems to quantum-resistant algorithms requires careful planning. A practical first step is to issue test certificates that incorporate Dilithium public keys, allowing organizations to pilot revocation and renewal processes at scale. During the transition, organizations may create dual-path PKIs or PQC-enabled intermediates to manage both legacy and quantum-safe certificates, reducing risk and simplifying the eventual switchover.
  • Long-Term Archive and Legal Digital Signatures: Certain types of digital records, such as legal, financial, or medical documents, require confidentiality and integrity for decades. Given the long retention period (20–50 years), these records are particularly vulnerable to future quantum attacks. For these high-assurance scenarios, using a hash-based signature scheme such as SPHINCS+ is recommended. SPHINCS+ relies solely on hash functions, providing strong security assurances even if mathematical attacks against other signature algorithms are discovered in the future. This makes it ideal for applications like digital notary systems, escrow services, and blockchain timestamping for sensitive records that require long-term trust.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

Key Challenges, Risks, and Industry Gaps 

Despite the promising features of NIST-approved PQC algorithms, several critical challenges remain for real-world enterprise adoption: 

  • Infrastructure Overhead: The increased size of PQC keys and signatures, particularly for hybrid deployments that combine classical and quantum-safe algorithms, can strain legacy systems. For instance, network appliances with hard-coded buffer limits may not be able to accommodate large certificates, resulting in failed operations or the need for costly infrastructure upgrades. These larger artifacts may also introduce measurable latency in operations such as TLS negotiations or S/MIME verification, particularly in use cases involving algorithms like SPHINCS+ with especially large signatures. Moreover, signature-heavy applications, like S/MIME with attachments or digital signatures in PDFs, must account for exponential increases in storage and bandwidth requirements.
  • Software Ecosystem Immaturity: While open libraries, such as liboqs and some versions of OpenSSL, now offer PQC support, most commercial cryptographic stacks still lag. Key vendor solutions can have only limited PQC capabilities. Furthermore, the shift towards Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (KEMs) and new abstraction interfaces complicates integration, as existing APIs are often not fully compatible. Security testing tools specialized for PQC, including those for fuzzing, side-channel analysis, or penetration testing, remain underdeveloped, increasing the risk of subtle implementation flaws.
  • Implementation Complexity: Lattice-based algorithms, which underpin many PQC schemes, can be vulnerable to side-channel attacks such as cache-timing or power analysis if not implemented with particular care. For example, Falcon requires the correct use of constant-time floating-point arithmetic, an uncommon requirement in many embedded or legacy environments. Organizations must also upgrade hardware security modules, vaults, and keystore software to accommodate novel key types and sizes, further increasing deployment complexity.
  • Operational Challenges: Operationally, PKI and certificate lifecycle management present obstacles. Many certificate authority (CA) systems and lifecycle tools have not yet incorporated PQC-compatible formats, making auto-enrollment, renewal, revocation, and monitoring cumbersome or unsupported. Major internet standards, including TLS, S/MIME, SSH, and IPsec, are still being updated for seamless PQC integration, and hybrid negotiation strategies are only gradually maturing. Enterprises reliant on legacy CA vendors or proprietary, closed cryptographic hardware may find themselves “locked in” and waiting years for vendor support, delaying overall migration timelines.

Ongoing NIST Efforts After Implementation

NIST’s involvement in post-quantum cryptography (PQC) extends beyond standardizing the algorithms. A key focus is modernizing its Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) to handle the increased volume and complexity of PQC and hybrid cryptographic modules. This ensures vendors can obtain timely certification, accelerating their ability to deploy quantum-resistant solutions while maintaining rigorous security standards. 

To support the practical adoption of PQC, NIST provides guidance, best practices, and tools to help organizations identify cryptographic use cases within their environments and implement PQC effectively. NIST is also an influential participant and leader in international standards bodies, such as ISO/IEC and IETF, working to harmonize PQC standards and protocols globally and reduce barriers for multinational organizations managing cross-border data flows. NIST also facilitates interoperability testing and collaborates with international standards bodies, easing cross-industry deployment. 

Beyond technical support, NIST engages with public and private sector stakeholders through initiatives like the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) to pilot practical PQC deployment use cases. These engagements include developing reference architectures, security controls, and implementation blueprints that organizations can adapt to their specific needs. Importantly, NIST acknowledges that PQC is a continuously evolving field. The agency has established mechanisms for ongoing evaluation and future-proofing of PQC standards, including monitoring advances in cryptanalysis and the development of quantum computing capabilities. By coordinating ongoing assessment and revisions, NIST helps ensure that the PQC ecosystem remains secure and adaptable, providing organizations with the confidence to transition into a quantum-safe future. 

Strategic Recommendations: What Enterprises Should Do Now 

Industry professionals agree that the transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is at a critical point. Many companies and vendors are beginning to plan their migrations in light of NIST’s publication of the PQC algorithm finalists and the recent finalization of important algorithms. To remain ahead in this changing environment, firms must be proactive as they evaluate the possible effects of these developments and build an efficient PQC readiness plan

Conduct a Cryptographic Discovery Audit 

Identify every instance where encryption or digital signatures are used: 

  • TLS configurations in load balancers 
  • VPN and IPsec tunnels 
  • Code signing and software update mechanisms 
  • PKI hierarchies and certificate issuance platforms 
  • SSH keys and email signing infrastructure

Begin PQC Pilot Programs

  • Set up a test PKI that issues Dilithium-based certificates 
  • Use OpenSSL to enable Kyber hybrid TLS 
  • Evaluate performance of SPHINCS+ signatures in archival systems 
  • Test PQC in CI/CD workflows to sign and verify software releases 

Build Crypto-Agility Into Systems

Avoid hard-coding any cryptographic algorithm. Use modular libraries, configurable cipher suites, and versioned protocols. Prefer protocol stacks like: 

  • TLS 1.3 with named groups 
  • SSH with customizable key types 
  • S/MIME with algorithm identifiers 

Work with Vendors and Industry Bodies 

Engage with: 

  • Your CA and PKI providers to request PQC support timelines 
  • Cloud vendors (AWS, Azure, GCP) to track their PQC infrastructure offerings 
  • Standardization bodies (ETSI, IETF) to stay current on protocol changes 

Define a 3-Phase Migration Roadmap

  • 2024-2025: Inventory, pilot programs, vendor engagement
  • 2026-2028: Begin phased migration of critical systems to hybrid models
  • 2029-2035: Full replacement of legacy RSA/ECC-based cryptography

Incorporate training programs and board-level awareness to ensure budget alignment and business continuity.

PQC Advisory Services

Prepare for the quantum era with our tailored post-quantum cryptography advisory services!

How can Encryption Consulting Help? 

If you are wondering how and where to begin your Post Quantum Cryptography Journey, Encryption Consulting is here to support you. Using NIST-aligned planning, focused risk reduction, and deep crypto discovery, our PQC Advisory Services can transform your environment into an audit-ready, quantum-resilient infrastructure. 

Comprehensive PQC Risk Assessment 

This is the foundational phase that builds visibility into your cryptographic infrastructure. We identify systems at risk from quantum threats and assess the readiness of your PKI, HSMs, and applications. This includes scanning certificates, keys, algorithms, and protocols across all environments, on-prem, cloud, and hybrid. We collect key metadata (e.g., algorithm types, key sizes, expiration) and create a detailed inventory of cryptographic assets to support risk assessment and planning.  

PQC Readiness & Vulnerability Assessment  

With visibility in place, we engage key stakeholders to assess quantum vulnerabilities and your preparedness for PQC transition. We analyze cryptographic elements, especially those using RSA, ECC, and similar algorithms, for exposure to quantum threats. This includes reviewing PKI and HSM configurations for PQC readiness and identifying applications with hardcoded cryptographic dependencies. The outcome is a detailed report outlining vulnerable assets, risk levels, and migration priorities. 

PQC Strategy and Roadmap 

With risks identified, we develop a phased migration strategy tailored to your business, technical, and regulatory needs. This includes a custom PQC adoption plan based on your risk profile and future-proofing goals, designing systems for algorithm agility, and aligning policies with NIST and CNSA 2.0 guidelines. We provide a step-by-step roadmap with clear short, medium, and long-term phases, covering pilot, hybrid, and full deployment. 

Vendor Evaluation and Proof of Concept 

At this stage, we help you identify and test the right tools, technologies, and partners to support your post-quantum goals. We define RFI/RFP requirements, such as algorithm support, integration, and performance, and shortlist leading PQC-capable vendors. PoC testing is conducted in isolated environments to assess fit, with results compiled into a vendor comparison matrix and recommendation report. 

Pilot Testing and Scaling

Before full rollout, we validate through controlled pilot testing to ensure real-world readiness and minimize disruption. We test new cryptographic models in sandbox environments, typically on one or two applications, to verify interoperability with existing systems and dependencies. Feedback from IT, security, and business teams will be taken to refine the plan. Following successful testing, we support a smooth, phased rollout that gradually replaces legacy algorithms while maintaining security and compliance.  

PQC Implementation 

With the plan set, we execute the full-scale migration, integrating PQC into your live environment while ensuring compliance and continuity. We implement hybrid models that combine classical and quantum-safe algorithms for a seamless transition. PQC support is rolled out across your PKI, applications, infrastructure, cloud, and APIs. We provide hands-on training, detailed documentation, and establish monitoring and lifecycle management to track cryptographic health, detect issues, and enable future upgrades.

You can greatly benefit from our service as we categorize data by lifespan and implement customized quantum-resistant protection for long-term confidentiality.  We also provide enterprise-wide crypto strategies and remediation plans to mitigate risks from outdated or weak cryptographic algorithms. We facilitate seamless migration to post-quantum algorithms for lasting resilience. We focus on developing a resilient governance structure that specifies roles, responsibilities, ownership, and rules for cryptographic standards and processes in the post-quantum age. We emphasize developing crypto-agile PKI architectures that readily swap out cryptographic algorithms as new threats or standards arise. 

Please reach out to us at [email protected] to get benefit of your PQC Advisory services. 

Conclusion 

The post-quantum era is not a distant future; it’s rapidly approaching, bringing with it an urgent need for enterprises to rethink how they secure digital trust. NIST’s standardization of post-quantum algorithms like Kyber, Dilithium, Falcon, and SPHINCS+ marks a critical shift in cryptographic defense strategy. These algorithms are more than just replacements; they represent a redefinition of what it means to be resilient in the face of quantum threats. For enterprises, this transition is not solely a technological challenge; it’s a business need. Cryptographic agility, inventory assessment, risk prioritization, and hybrid deployment models must become embedded in enterprise security strategy.

From secure communications and software signing to certificate management and hardware integrations, each area of the stack must be reviewed through the lens of quantum resistance. Ultimately, this is about building resilience in a future defined by uncertainty, where the only way to ensure security is to adapt continuously.